# Calibrating LLM-Based Evaluator

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13308 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13308/

## Key facts

- Cited by 53 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.5726/) (2014)
- [Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09690/) (2021)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14251/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17926/) (2023)
- [COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09025/) (2020)
- [AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14387/) (2023)
- [BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11520/) (2021)
- [SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12626/) (2020)
- [Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04048/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14520/) (2023)
- [MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02622/) (2019)
- [Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04228/) (2020)
- [GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desire](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04166/) (2023)
- [Newsroom: A Dataset of 1.3 Million Summaries with Diverse Extractive Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.11283/) (2018)
- [Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07197/) (2022)
- [USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00456/) (2020)
- [Semantically Conditioned LSTM-based Natural Language Generation for Spoken Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.01745/) (2015)
- [Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation in Many Languages via Zero-Shot Paraphrasing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14564/) (2020)
- [Error Analysis Prompting Enables Human-Like Translation Evaluation in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13809/) (2023)
- [GRADE: Automatic Graph-Enhanced Coherence Metric for Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03994/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 53)

- [LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05579/) (2024)
- [AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09024/) (2024)
- [WebSailor: Navigating Super-human Reasoning for Web Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02592/) (2025)
- [LooGLE: Can Long-Context Language Models Understand Long Contexts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04939/) (2023)
- [Beyond Ten Turns: Unlocking Long-Horizon Agentic Search with Large-Scale Asynchronous RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07976/) (2025)
- [Aligning with Human Judgement: The Role of Pairwise Preference in Large Language Model Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16950/) (2024)
- [WebWatcher: Breaking New Frontier of Vision-Language Deep Research Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05748/) (2025)
- [WebExplorer: Explore and Evolve for Training Long-Horizon Web Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06501/) (2025)
- [LLM-based NLG Evaluation: Current Status and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01383/) (2024)
- [WebResearcher: Unleashing unbounded reasoning capability in Long-Horizon Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13309/) (2025)
- [WebSailor-V2: Bridging the Chasm to Proprietary Agents via Synthetic Data and Scalable Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13305/) (2025)
- [Multicalibration for Confidence Scoring in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04689/) (2024)
- [Inverse Constitutional AI: Compressing Preferences into Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06560/) (2024)
- [UDA: A Benchmark Suite for Retrieval Augmented Generation in Real-world Document Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15187/) (2024)
- [FairMT-Bench: Benchmarking Fairness for Multi-turn Dialogue in Conversational LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19317/) (2024)
- [How Susceptible are LLMs to Influence in Prompts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11865/) (2024)
- [LaRA: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Long-Context LLMs -- No Silver Bullet for LC or RAG Routing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09977/) (2025)
- [Toward Generalizable Evaluation in the LLM Era: A Survey Beyond Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18838/) (2025)
- [CLAVE: An Adaptive Framework for Evaluating Values of LLM Generated Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10725/) (2024)
- [An Empirical Analysis of Uncertainty in Large Language Model Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10709/) (2025)
- [DEsignBench: Exploring and Benchmarking DALL-E 3 for Imagining Visual Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15144/) (2023)
- [Raising the Bar: Investigating the Values of Large Language Models via Generative Evolving Testing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14230/) (2024)
- [Automated radiotherapy treatment planning guided by GPT-4Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15609/) (2024)
- [Consensus Entropy: Harnessing Multi-VLM Agreement for Self-Verifying and Self-Improving OCR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11101/) (2025)
- [Concept -- An Evaluation Protocol on Conversational Recommender Systems with System-centric and User-centric Factors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03304/) (2024)
- [Varying Shades of Wrong: Aligning LLMs with Wrong Answers Only](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11055/) (2024)
- [Multi-Agent LLM Judge: automatic personalized LLM judge design for evaluating natural language generation applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02867/) (2025)
- [Efficient Inference for Noisy LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05420/) (2026)
- [Large Language Models Are Active Critics in NLG Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10724/) (2024)
- [Aggregation of Reasoning: A Hierarchical Framework for Enhancing Answer Selection in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.12939/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) on language modeling and emergent capabilities make them a promising reference-free evaluator of natural language generation quality, and a competent alternative to human evaluation. However, hindered by the closed-source or high computational demand to host and tune, there is a lack of practice to further calibrate an off-the-shelf LLM-based evaluator towards better human alignment. In this work, we propose AutoCalibrate, a multi-stage, gradient-free approach to automatically calibrate and align an LLM-based evaluator toward human preference. Instead of explicitly modeling human preferences, we first implicitly encompass them within a set of human labels. Then, an initial set of scoring criteria is drafted by the language model itself, leveraging in-context learning on different few-shot examples. To further calibrate this set of criteria, we select the best performers and re-draft them with self-refinement. Our experiments on multiple text quality evaluation datasets illustrate a significant improvement in correlation with expert evaluation through calibration. Our comprehensive qualitative analysis conveys insightful intuitions and observations on the essence of effective scoring criteria.