# The Role of Inclusion, Control, and Ownership in Workplace AI-Mediated Communication

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.11599 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11599/

## Key facts

- Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2023.

## Built on by (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11360/) (2024)
- [ProactiveVA: Proactive Visual Analytics with LLM-Based UI Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18165/) (2025)
- [Where Do I 'Add the Egg'?: Exploring Agency and Ownership in AI Creative Co-Writing Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.15440/) (2025)
- [Reactive Writers: How Co-Writing with AI Changes How We Engage with Ideas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10374/) (2026)
- [MeetMap: Real-Time Collaborative Dialogue Mapping with LLMs in Online Meetings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01564/) (2025)
- [AI Rivalry as a Craft: How Resisting and Embracing Generative AI Reshape Writing Professions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09901/) (2025)
- [Scaffolding Recursive Divergence and Convergence in Story Ideation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.03307/) (2025)
- [Not My Truce: Personality Differences in AI-Mediated Workplace Negotiation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00464/) (2026)
- [Who Owns the Text? Design Patterns for Preserving Authorship in AI-Assisted Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.10236/) (2026)
- [From Use to Oversight: How Mental Models Influence User Behavior and Output in AI Writing Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05166/) (2026)
- [How AI Writing Assistance Distorts Perceptions of AI Users and Their Opinions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.22503/) (2026)
- [Large Language Model Use Impact Locus of Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11406/) (2025)
- [Can AI be a moral victim? The role of moral patiency and ownership perceptions in ethical judgments of using AI-generated content](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26956/) (2026)
- [How Do Novice Describers Edit AI Drafts? The Role of Draft Quality in Audio Description Authoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05348/) (2026)
- [Double-Edged Sword or Sharp Tool? Designing and Evaluating Triadic LLM-Teacher Collaboration for K-12 Writing at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30200/) (2026)
- [Can You Say This for Me? Speaking Up by Proxy in Co-Located Discussion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.26185/) (2026)
- [LLMs as Oracles: Reliance on LLMs for Subjective Personal Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14849/) (2026)
- [PeerPen: AI-Assisted Writing for Online Mental Health Peer Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14886/) (2026)
- [When No One Owns the Judgment: Accountability Under Contribution Dissolution in Human-AI Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29312/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Given large language models' (LLMs) increasing integration into workplace software, it is important to examine how biases in the models may impact workers. For example, stylistic biases in the language suggested by LLMs may cause feelings of alienation and result in increased labor for individuals or groups whose style does not match. We examine how such writer-style bias impacts inclusion, control, and ownership over the work when co-writing with LLMs. In an online experiment, participants wrote hypothetical job promotion requests using either hesitant or self-assured autocomplete suggestions from an LLM and reported their subsequent perceptions. We found that the style of the AI model did not impact perceived inclusion. However, individuals with higher perceived inclusion did perceive greater agency and ownership, an effect more strongly impacting participants of minoritized genders. Feelings of inclusion mitigated a loss of control and agency when accepting more AI suggestions.