# Learning Adaptive Safety for Multi-Agent Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10657 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10657/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.02971/) (2015)
- [Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09477/) (2018)
- [High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02438/) (2015)
- [Constrained Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.10528/) (2017)
- [Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.08611/) (2017)
- [Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08551/) (2017)
- [Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.03964/) (2020)
- [A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.07708/) (2018)
- [End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning through Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Continuous Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.08792/) (2019)
- [Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.06408/) (2016)
- [Safe Control with Learned Certificates: A Survey of Neural Lyapunov, Barrier, and Contraction methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11762/) (2022)
- [IPO: Interior-point Policy Optimization under Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09615/) (2019)
- [OmniSafe: An Infrastructure for Accelerating Safe Reinforcement Learning Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09304/) (2023)
- [Learning Safe Multi-Agent Control with Decentralized Neural Barrier Certificates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05436/) (2021)
- [Saute RL: Almost Surely Safe Reinforcement Learning Using State Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06558/) (2022)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Safety-Critical Control under Model Uncertainty, using Control Lyapunov Functions and Control Barrier Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07584/) (2020)
- [Enforcing Hard Constraints with Soft Barriers: Safe Reinforcement Learning in Unknown Stochastic Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15090/) (2022)
- [Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Robust Control Barrier Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05415/) (2021)
- [Control Barrier Functions for Systems with High Relative Degree](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.04706/) (2019)
- [Temporal Logic Guided Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Control Barrier Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.09885/) (2019)
- [Safe Multi-Agent Interaction through Robust Control Barrier Functions with Learned Uncertainties](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05273/) (2020)
- [Robust Policy Optimization in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07536/) (2022)
- [Rule-Based Safety-Critical Control Design using Control Barrier Functions with Application to Autonomous Lane Change](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12382/) (2021)
- [Differentiable Safe Controller Design through Control Barrier Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10034/) (2022)
- [Safety-Critical Control using Optimal-decay Control Barrier Function with Guaranteed Point-wise Feasibility](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12375/) (2021)
- [Recursive Feasibility Guided Optimal Parameter Adaptation of Differential Convex Optimization Policies for Safety-Critical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.10949/) (2021)
- [Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Guided by Signal Temporal Logic Specifications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06808/) (2023)
- [Trust-based Rate-Tunable Control Barrier Functions for Non-Cooperative Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.04555/) (2022)
- [Compatibility checking of multiple control barrier functions for input constrained systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.02284/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Control Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Autonomous Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14850/) (2025)
- [Robust and Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Communication for Autonomous Vehicles: From Simulation to Hardware](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00982/) (2025)
- [Individual Control Barrier Functions-Guided Diffusion Model for Safe Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12640/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring safety in dynamic multi-agent systems is challenging due to limited information about the other agents. Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) are showing promise for safety assurance but current methods make strong assumptions about other agents and often rely on manual tuning to balance safety, feasibility, and performance. In this work, we delve into the problem of adaptive safe learning for multi-agent systems with CBF. We show how emergent behavior can be profoundly influenced by the CBF configuration, highlighting the necessity for a responsive and dynamic approach to CBF design. We present ASRL, a novel adaptive safe RL framework, to fully automate the optimization of policy and CBF coefficients, to enhance safety and long-term performance through reinforcement learning. By directly interacting with the other agents, ASRL learns to cope with diverse agent behaviours and maintains the cost violations below a desired limit. We evaluate ASRL in a multi-robot system and a competitive multi-agent racing scenario, against learning-based and control-theoretic approaches. We empirically demonstrate the efficacy and flexibility of ASRL, and assess generalization and scalability to out-of-distribution scenarios. Code and supplementary material are public online.
