# Code Representation Pre-training with Complements from Program Executions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09980 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09980/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05722/) (2019)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08821/) (2021)
- [Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.08144/) (2016)
- [CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08155/) (2020)
- [Cross-lingual Language Model Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.07291/) (2019)
- [CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00859/) (2021)
- [Contrastive Representation Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10699/) (2019)
- [CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04664/) (2021)
- [CodeSearchNet Challenge: Evaluating the State of Semantic Code Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.09436/) (2019)
- [GraphCodeBERT: Pre-training Code Representations with Data Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.08366/) (2020)
- [UniXcoder: Unified Cross-Modal Pre-training for Code Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03850/) (2022)
- [CodeT5+: Open Code Large Language Models for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07922/) (2023)
- [Devign: Effective Vulnerability Identification by Learning Comprehensive Program Semantics via Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03496/) (2019)
- [Learning to Represent Programs with Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00740/) (2017)
- [CodeNet: A Large-Scale AI for Code Dataset for Learning a Diversity of Coding Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.12655/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are Few-shot Testers: Exploring LLM-based General Bug Reproduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11515/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Fuzzers: Fuzzing Deep-Learning Libraries via Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.14834/) (2022)
- [CoSQA: 20,000+ Web Queries for Code Search and Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.13239/) (2021)
- [StructCoder: Structure-Aware Transformer for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05239/) (2022)
- [Code Execution with Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05383/) (2023)
- [Towards Learning (Dis)-Similarity of Source Code from Program Contrasts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.03868/) (2021)
- [ContraBERT: Enhancing Code Pre-trained Models via Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.09072/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [The Program Testing Ability of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05727/) (2023)
- [UniTSyn: A Large-Scale Dataset Capable of Enhancing the Prowess of Large Language Models for Program Testing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03396/) (2024)
- [Functional Consistency of LLM Code Embeddings: A Self-Evolving Data Synthesis Framework for Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.19558/) (2025)
- [FuzzAug: Data Augmentation by Coverage-guided Fuzzing for Neural Test Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08665/) (2024)
- [Investigating Execution-Aware Language Models for Code Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08228/) (2025)
- [Do Papers Tell the Whole Story? A Benchmark and Framework for Uncovering Hidden Implementation Gaps in Bioinformatics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22018/) (2026)
- [Content Fuzzing for Escaping Information Cocoons on Digital Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05461/) (2026)
- [Invariant Pretraining for Robust Code Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.15412/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) for natural language processing have been grafted onto programming language modeling for advancing code intelligence. Although it can be represented in the text format, code is syntactically more rigorous in order to be properly compiled or interpreted to perform a desired set of behaviors given any inputs. In this case, existing works benefit from syntactic representations to learn from code less ambiguously in the forms of abstract syntax tree, control-flow graph, etc. However, programs with the same purpose can be implemented in various ways showing different syntactic representations while the ones with similar implementations can have distinct behaviors. Though trivially demonstrated during executions, such semantics about functionality are challenging to be learned directly from code, especially in an unsupervised manner. Hence, in this paper, we propose FuzzPretrain to explore the dynamic information of programs revealed by their test cases and embed it into the feature representations of code as complements. The test cases are obtained with the assistance of a customized fuzzer and are only required during pre-training. FuzzPretrain yielded more than 6%/9% mAP improvements on code search over its counterparts trained with only source code or AST, respectively. Our extensive experimental results show the benefits of learning discriminative code representations with program executions.