# Scaled Prompt-Tuning for Few-Shot Natural Language Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06759 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06759/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00751/) (2019)
- [Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00190/) (2021)
- [The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08691/) (2021)
- [Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08207/) (2021)
- [BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.10199/) (2021)
- [Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.05638/) (2022)
- [Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04366/) (2021)
- [AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00247/) (2020)
- [P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07602/) (2021)
- [Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13255/) (2020)
- [Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04647/) (2021)
- [Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recall](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05240/) (2021)
- [AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11918/) (2020)
- [WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgramming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00121/) (2021)
- [Training Neural Networks with Fixed Sparse Masks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09839/) (2021)
- [UniPELT: A Unified Framework for Parameter-Efficient Language Model Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07577/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13334/) (2025)
- [Path-Decoupled Hyperbolic Flow Matching for Few-Shot Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20479/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The increasingly Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate stronger language understanding and generation capabilities, while the memory demand and computation cost of fine-tuning LLMs on downstream tasks are non-negligible. Besides, fine-tuning generally requires a certain amount of data from individual tasks whilst data collection cost is another issue to consider in real-world applications. In this work, we focus on Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods for few-shot Natural Language Generation (NLG), which freeze most parameters in LLMs and tune a small subset of parameters in few-shot cases so that memory footprint, training cost, and labeling cost are reduced while maintaining or even improving the performance. We propose a Scaled Prompt-Tuning (SPT) method which surpasses conventional PT with better performance and generalization ability but without an obvious increase in training cost. Further study on intermediate SPT suggests the superior transferability of SPT in few-shot scenarios, providing a recipe for data-deficient and computation-limited circumstances. Moreover, a comprehensive comparison of existing PEFT methods reveals that certain approaches exhibiting decent performance with modest training cost such as Prefix-Tuning in prior study could struggle in few-shot NLG tasks, especially on challenging datasets.