# NESTLE: a No-Code Tool for Statistical Analysis of Legal Corpus

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.04146 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.04146/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11934/) (2020)
- [Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15334/) (2023)
- [AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06364/) (2023)
- [ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05301/) (2023)
- [ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06840/) (2021)
- [LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00976/) (2021)
- [ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13304/) (2023)
- [CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06268/) (2021)
- [Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10450/) (2022)
- [AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16854/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model Is Not a Good Few-shot Information Extractor, but a Good Reranker for Hard Samples!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08559/) (2023)
- [Data-Copilot: Bridging Billions of Data and Humans with Autonomous Workflow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07209/) (2023)
- [CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Service](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.01217/) (2018)
- [A Multi-Task Benchmark for Korean Legal Language Understanding and Judgement Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05224/) (2022)
- [Prompt2Model: Generating Deployable Models from Natural Language Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12261/) (2023)
- [LEVEN: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Event Detection Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.08556/) (2022)
- [Mining Legal Arguments in Court Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.06178/) (2022)
- [ChatGPT may Pass the Bar Exam soon, but has a Long Way to Go for the LexGLUE benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12202/) (2023)
- [Data-efficient End-to-end Information Extraction for Statistical Legal Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01692/) (2022)
- [Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Extracting Information from Registration and Legal Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05658/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The statistical analysis of large scale legal corpus can provide valuable legal insights. For such analysis one needs to (1) select a subset of the corpus using document retrieval tools, (2) structure text using information extraction (IE) systems, and (3) visualize the data for the statistical analysis. Each process demands either specialized tools or programming skills whereas no comprehensive unified "no-code" tools have been available. Here we provide NESTLE, a no-code tool for large-scale statistical analysis of legal corpus. Powered by a Large Language Model (LLM) and the internal custom end-to-end IE system, NESTLE can extract any type of information that has not been predefined in the IE system opening up the possibility of unlimited customizable statistical analysis of the corpus without writing a single line of code. We validate our system on 15 Korean precedent IE tasks and 3 legal text classification tasks from LexGLUE. The comprehensive experiments reveal NESTLE can achieve GPT-4 comparable performance by training the internal IE module with 4 human-labeled, and 192 LLM-labeled examples.