# Interpretable Visual Question Answering via Reasoning Supervision

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03726 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03726/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07332/) (2016)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07490/) (2019)
- [Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.06165/) (2020)
- [VL-BERT: Pre-training of Generic Visual-Linguistic Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.08530/) (2019)
- [From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10830/) (2018)
- [Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.00377/) (2017)
- [MERLOT: Multimodal Neural Script Knowledge Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02636/) (2021)
- [Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Grounded](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.03751/) (2019)
- [VinVL: Revisiting Visual Representations in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00529/) (2021)
- [Beyond Question-Based Biases: Assessing Multimodal Shortcut Learning in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.03149/) (2021)
- [MUTANT: A Training Paradigm for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.08566/) (2020)
- [Grounding Answers for Visual Questions Asked by Visually Impaired People](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01993/) (2022)
- [SwapMix: Diagnosing and Regularizing the Over-Reliance on Visual Context in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02285/) (2022)
- [Exploring Human-like Attention Supervision in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.06308/) (2017)
- [Interpretable Visual Question Answering by Visual Grounding from Attention Supervision Mining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.00265/) (2018)
- [Towards Robust Visual Question Answering: Making the Most of Biased Samples via Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04563/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Surgical-VQLA++: Adversarial Contrastive Learning for Calibrated Robust Visual Question-Localized Answering in Robotic Surgery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04958/) (2024)
- [Direct Visual Grounding by Directing Attention of Visual Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.12738/) (2025)
- [Self-Supervised Learning for Visual Relationship Detection through Masked Bounding Box Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04834/) (2023)
- [VisionTrap: Unanswerable Questions On Visual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17262/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Transformer-based architectures have recently demonstrated remarkable performance in the Visual Question Answering (VQA) task. However, such models are likely to disregard crucial visual cues and often rely on multimodal shortcuts and inherent biases of the language modality to predict the correct answer, a phenomenon commonly referred to as lack of visual grounding. In this work, we alleviate this shortcoming through a novel architecture for visual question answering that leverages common sense reasoning as a supervisory signal. Reasoning supervision takes the form of a textual justification of the correct answer, with such annotations being already available on large-scale Visual Common Sense Reasoning (VCR) datasets. The model's visual attention is guided toward important elements of the scene through a similarity loss that aligns the learned attention distributions guided by the question and the correct reasoning. We demonstrate both quantitatively and qualitatively that the proposed approach can boost the model's visual perception capability and lead to performance increase, without requiring training on explicit grounding annotations.
