# Towards Efficient Training with Negative Samples in Visual Tracking

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02903 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.02903/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 35 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06377/) (2021)
- [Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.09630/) (2019)
- [SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09886/) (2021)
- [Fully-Convolutional Siamese Networks for Object Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.09549/) (2016)
- [Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02424/) (2019)
- [GOT-10k: A Large High-Diversity Benchmark for Generic Object Tracking in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.11981/) (2018)
- [LaSOT: A High-quality Benchmark for Large-scale Single Object Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.07845/) (2018)
- [Transformer Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15436/) (2021)
- [Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04388/) (2020)
- [Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.17154/) (2021)
- [TrackingNet: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Object Tracking in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.10794/) (2018)
- [Joint Feature Learning and Relation Modeling for Tracking: A One-Stream Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11991/) (2022)
- [Context Autoencoder for Self-Supervised Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03026/) (2022)
- [MixFormer: End-to-End Tracking with Iterative Mixed Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11082/) (2022)
- [Transformer Meets Tracker: Exploiting Temporal Context for Robust Visual Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.11681/) (2021)
- [Ocean: Object-aware Anchor-free Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10721/) (2020)
- [Universal Instance Perception as Object Discovery and Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.06674/) (2023)
- [Siam R-CNN: Visual Tracking by Re-Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.12836/) (2019)
- [AiATrack: Attention in Attention for Transformer Visual Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.09603/) (2022)
- [Learning Target Candidate Association to Keep Track of What Not to Track](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16556/) (2021)
- [SwinTrack: A Simple and Strong Baseline for Transformer Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00995/) (2021)
- [Backbone is All Your Need: A Simplified Architecture for Visual Object Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05328/) (2022)
- [Generalized Focal Loss V2: Learning Reliable Localization Quality Estimation for Dense Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.12885/) (2020)
- [Towards Grand Unification of Object Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.07078/) (2022)
- [Generalized Relation Modeling for Transformer Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16580/) (2023)
- [STMTrack: Template-free Visual Tracking with Space-time Memory Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00324/) (2021)
- [Alpha-Refine: Boosting Tracking Performance by Precise Bounding Box Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02024/) (2020)
- [Transformer Tracking with Cyclic Shifting Window Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.03806/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [LiteTrack: Layer Pruning with Asynchronous Feature Extraction for Lightweight and Efficient Visual Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09249/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Current state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods in visual object tracking often require extensive computational resources and vast amounts of training data, leading to a risk of overfitting. This study introduces a more efficient training strategy to mitigate overfitting and reduce computational requirements. We balance the training process with a mix of negative and positive samples from the outset, named as Joint learning with Negative samples (JN). Negative samples refer to scenarios where the object from the template is not present in the search region, which helps to prevent the model from simply memorizing the target, and instead encourages it to use the template for object location. To handle the negative samples effectively, we adopt a distribution-based head, which modeling the bounding box as distribution of distances to express uncertainty about the target's location in the presence of negative samples, offering an efficient way to manage the mixed sample training. Furthermore, our approach introduces a target-indicating token. It encapsulates the target's precise location within the template image. This method provides exact boundary details with negligible computational cost but improving performance. Our model, JN-256, exhibits superior performance on challenging benchmarks, achieving 75.8% AO on GOT-10k and 84.1% AUC on TrackingNet. Notably, JN-256 outperforms previous SOTA trackers that utilize larger models and higher input resolutions, even though it is trained with only half the number of data sampled used in those works.