# Value Kaleidoscope: Engaging AI with Pluralistic Human Values, Rights, and Duties

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00779 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00779/

## Key facts

- Cited by 97 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 42 of its 225 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 42)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [Datasheets for Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09010/) (2018)
- [ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15056/) (2023)
- [Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17548/) (2023)
- [Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15217/) (2023)
- [Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06899/) (2022)
- [Aligning AI With Shared Human Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.02275/) (2020)
- [Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.04558/) (2016)
- [Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16388/) (2023)
- [How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resources](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04751/) (2023)
- [Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01693/) (2023)
- [Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03891/) (2019)
- [Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05719/) (2021)
- [Symbolic Knowledge Distillation: from General Language Models to Commonsense Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07178/) (2021)
- [From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08283/) (2023)
- [Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Norms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00620/) (2020)
- [COMET-ATOMIC 2020: On Symbolic and Neural Commonsense Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05953/) (2020)
- [Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03514/) (2023)
- [Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01241/) (2022)
- [Quark: Controllable Text Generation with Reinforced Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13636/) (2022)
- [Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14324/) (2023)
- [WANLI: Worker and AI Collaboration for Natural Language Inference Dataset Creation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05955/) (2022)
- [SODA: Million-scale Dialogue Distillation with Social Commonsense Contextualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10465/) (2022)
- [Can Machines Learn Morality? The Delphi Experiment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07574/) (2021)
- [The 'Problem' of Human Label Variation: On Ground Truth in Data, Modeling and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.02570/) (2022)
- [Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02950/) (2022)
- [SCOTT: Self-Consistent Chain-of-Thought Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01879/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 97)

- [Towards Measuring and Modeling "Culture" in LLMs: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15412/) (2024)
- [Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning a Language Model with Public Input](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07814/) (2024)
- [Aligning to Thousands of Preferences via System Message Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17977/) (2024)
- [PAD: Personalized Alignment of LLMs at Decoding-Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04070/) (2024)
- [DailyDilemmas: Revealing Value Preferences of LLMs with Quandaries of Daily Life](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02683/) (2024)
- [Values in the Wild: Discovering and Analyzing Values in Real-World Language Model Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15236/) (2025)
- [Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00935/) (2023)
- [Value FULCRA: Mapping Large Language Models to the Multidimensional Spectrum of Basic Human Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10766/) (2023)
- [Language Model Alignment in Multilingual Trolley Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02273/) (2024)
- [DELL: Generating Reactions and Explanations for LLM-Based Misinformation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10426/) (2024)
- [Culture is Not Trivia: Sociocultural Theory for Cultural NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12057/) (2025)
- [Controllable Safety Alignment: Inference-Time Adaptation to Diverse Safety Requirements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08968/) (2024)
- [Debate-to-Write: A Persona-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Diverse Argument Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19643/) (2024)
- [Evaluating the Prompt Steerability of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12405/) (2024)
- [Probing the Moral Development of Large Language Models through Defining Issues Test](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13356/) (2023)
- [CLAVE: An Adaptive Framework for Evaluating Values of LLM Generated Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10725/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17675/) (2024)
- [The Coming Crisis of Multi-Agent Misalignment: AI Alignment Must Be a Dynamic and Social Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01080/) (2025)
- [High-Dimension Human Value Representation in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07900/) (2024)
- [AI Alignment at Your Discretion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10441/) (2025)
- [The Potential and Challenges of Evaluating Attitudes, Opinions, and Values in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11096/) (2024)
- [What Makes it Ok to Set a Fire? Iterative Self-distillation of Contexts and Rationales for Disambiguating Defeasible Social and Moral Situations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15431/) (2023)
- [Measuring Human and AI Values Based on Generative Psychometrics with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12106/) (2024)
- [Building Knowledge-Guided Lexica to Model Cultural Variation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11622/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Moral Beliefs across LLMs through a Pluralistic Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03665/) (2024)
- [Value Imprint: A Technique for Auditing the Human Values Embedded in RLHF Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.11937/) (2024)
- [Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13383/) (2025)
- [Does Cross-Cultural Alignment Change the Commonsense Morality of Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16316/) (2024)
- [SafetyAnalyst: Interpretable, Transparent, and Steerable Safety Moderation for AI Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16665/) (2024)
- [CLASH: Evaluating Language Models on Judging High-Stakes Dilemmas from Multiple Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10823/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Human values are crucial to human decision-making. Value pluralism is the view that multiple correct values may be held in tension with one another (e.g., when considering lying to a friend to protect their feelings, how does one balance honesty with friendship?). As statistical learners, AI systems fit to averages by default, washing out these potentially irreducible value conflicts. To improve AI systems to better reflect value pluralism, the first-order challenge is to explore the extent to which AI systems can model pluralistic human values, rights, and duties as well as their interaction. We introduce ValuePrism, a large-scale dataset of 218k values, rights, and duties connected to 31k human-written situations. ValuePrism's contextualized values are generated by GPT-4 and deemed high-quality by human annotators 91% of the time. We conduct a large-scale study with annotators across diverse social and demographic backgrounds to try to understand whose values are represented. With ValuePrism, we build Kaleido, an open, light-weight, and structured language-based multi-task model that generates, explains, and assesses the relevance and valence (i.e., support or oppose) of human values, rights, and duties within a specific context. Humans prefer the sets of values output by our system over the teacher GPT-4, finding them more accurate and with broader coverage. In addition, we demonstrate that Kaleido can help explain variability in human decision-making by outputting contrasting values. Finally, we show that Kaleido's representations transfer to other philosophical frameworks and datasets, confirming the benefit of an explicit, modular, and interpretable approach to value pluralism. We hope that our work will serve as a step to making more explicit the implicit values behind human decision-making and to steering AI systems to make decisions that are more in accordance with them.