# Iterative Reward Shaping using Human Feedback for Correcting Reward Misspecification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15969 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15969/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 16 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Reward modeling and RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/reward-modeling-and-rlhf/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Concrete Problems in AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06565/) (2016)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.00444/) (2020)
- [A Brief Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.05866/) (2017)
- [The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03544/) (2022)
- [Reward learning from human preferences and demonstrations in Atari](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.06521/) (2018)
- [A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progress](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.06877/) (2018)
- [Interactive Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06049/) (2017)
- [Deep TAMER: Interactive Agent Shaping in High-Dimensional State Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.10163/) (2017)
- [Imitation Learning: Progress, Taxonomies and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12177/) (2021)
- [Interestingness Elements for Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Understanding Agents' Capabilities and Limitations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.09007/) (2019)
- [Widening the Pipeline in Human-Guided Reinforcement Learning with Explanation and Context-Aware Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14804/) (2020)
- [Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.06036/) (2020)
- [FRESH: Interactive Reward Shaping in High-Dimensional State Spaces using Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.06781/) (2020)
- [Active Inverse Reward Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.03060/) (2018)
- [Learning Rewards to Optimize Global Performance Metrics in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09027/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Zero-Shot LLMs in Human-in-the-Loop RL: Replacing Human Feedback for Reward Shaping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22723/) (2025)
- [Tell me why: Training preferences-based RL with human preferences and step-level explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14244/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A well-defined reward function is crucial for successful training of an reinforcement learning (RL) agent. However, defining a suitable reward function is a notoriously challenging task, especially in complex, multi-objective environments. Developers often have to resort to starting with an initial, potentially misspecified reward function, and iteratively adjusting its parameters, based on observed learned behavior. In this work, we aim to automate this process by proposing ITERS, an iterative reward shaping approach using human feedback for mitigating the effects of a misspecified reward function. Our approach allows the user to provide trajectory-level feedback on agent's behavior during training, which can be integrated as a reward shaping signal in the following training iteration. We also allow the user to provide explanations of their feedback, which are used to augment the feedback and reduce user effort and feedback frequency. We evaluate ITERS in three environments and show that it can successfully correct misspecified reward functions.