# A Comprehensive Augmentation Framework for Anomaly Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15068 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15068/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.04899/) (2019)
- [Describing Textures in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.3618/) (2013)
- [Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.04552/) (2017)
- [Random Erasing Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.04896/) (2017)
- [Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08265/) (2021)
- [CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.04015/) (2021)
- [DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07610/) (2021)
- [Improving Unsupervised Defect Segmentation by Applying Structural Similarity to Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.02011/) (2018)
- [Self-Supervised Predictive Convolutional Attentive Block for Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09099/) (2021)
- [Natural Synthetic Anomalies for Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.15222/) (2021)
- [Is AUC the best measure for practical comparison of anomaly detectors?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04754/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Normal-Abnormal Guided Generalist Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00495/) (2025)
- [Unlocking the Potential of Reverse Distillation for Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07579/) (2024)
- [Adapted-MoE: Mixture of Experts with Test-Time Adaption for Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.05611/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Foundation-Model-Based Industrial Defect Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19106/) (2025)
- [One-to-More: High-Fidelity Training-Free Anomaly Generation with Attention Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.18093/) (2026)
- [MathPhys-Guided Coarse-to-Fine Anomaly Synthesis with SQE-Driven Bi-Level Optimization for Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12970/) (2025)
- [MAGIC: Few-Shot Mask-Guided Anomaly Inpainting with Prompt Perturbation, Spatially Adaptive Guidance, and Context Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02314/) (2025)
- [Tuned Reverse Distillation: Enhancing Multimodal Industrial Anomaly Detection with Crossmodal Tuners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08949/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Data augmentation methods are commonly integrated into the training of anomaly detection models. Previous approaches have primarily focused on replicating real-world anomalies or enhancing diversity, without considering that the standard of anomaly varies across different classes, potentially leading to a biased training distribution. This paper analyzes crucial traits of simulated anomalies that contribute to the training of reconstructive networks and condenses them into several methods, thus creating a comprehensive framework by selectively utilizing appropriate combinations. Furthermore, we integrate this framework with a reconstruction-based approach and concurrently propose a split training strategy that alleviates the issue of overfitting while avoiding introducing interference to the reconstruction process. The evaluations conducted on the MVTec anomaly detection dataset demonstrate that our method outperforms the previous state-of-the-art approach, particularly in terms of object classes. To evaluate generalizability, we generate a simulated dataset comprising anomalies with diverse characteristics since the original test samples only include specific types of anomalies and may lead to biased evaluations. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach exhibits promising potential for generalizing effectively to various unforeseen anomalies encountered in real-world scenarios.