# Local-Global Pseudo-label Correction for Source-free Domain Adaptive Medical Image Segmentation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14312 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14312/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.02611/) (2018)
- [Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.07818/) (2015)
- [Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02357/) (2016)
- [Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.02791/) (2015)
- [Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.05464/) (2017)
- [Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08546/) (2020)
- [ADVENT: Adversarial Entropy Minimization for Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12833/) (2018)
- [Deep Domain Confusion: Maximizing for Domain Invariance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.3474/) (2014)
- [Confidence Regularized Self-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09822/) (2019)
- [Uncertainty-aware Self-ensembling Model for Semi-supervised 3D Left Atrium Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.07034/) (2019)
- [REFUGE Challenge: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Automated Methods for Glaucoma Assessment from Fundus Photographs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03667/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Intra-domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation through Self-Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07703/) (2020)
- [Exploiting the Intrinsic Neighborhood Structure for Source-free Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04202/) (2021)
- [Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation with Maximum Squares Loss](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13589/) (2019)
- [Test-Time Adaptable Neural Networks for Robust Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04668/) (2020)
- [Domain Impression: A Source Data Free Domain Adaptation Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09003/) (2021)
- [Domain Adaptation without Source Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01524/) (2020)
- [Source-Free Domain Adaptive Fundus Image Segmentation with Denoised Pseudo-Labeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09735/) (2021)
- [Source-Relaxed Domain Adaptation for Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03697/) (2020)
- [Boundary and Entropy-driven Adversarial Learning for Fundus Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.11143/) (2019)
- [Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation without Source Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06484/) (2021)
- [Target and Task specific Source-Free Domain Adaptive Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15792/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Domain shift is a commonly encountered issue in medical imaging solutions, primarily caused by variations in imaging devices and data sources. To mitigate this problem, unsupervised domain adaptation techniques have been employed. However, concerns regarding patient privacy and potential degradation of image quality have led to an increased focus on source-free domain adaptation. In this study, we address the issue of false labels in self-training based source-free domain adaptive medical image segmentation methods. To correct erroneous pseudo-labels, we propose a novel approach called the local-global pseudo-label correction (LGDA) method for source-free domain adaptive medical image segmentation. Our method consists of two components: An offline local context-based pseudo-label correction method that utilizes local context similarity in image space. And an online global pseudo-label correction method based on class prototypes, which corrects erroneously predicted pseudo-labels by considering the relative distance between pixel-wise feature vectors and prototype vectors. We evaluate the performance of our method on three benchmark fundus image datasets for optic disc and cup segmentation. Our method achieves superior performance compared to the state-of-the-art approaches, even without using of any source data.