# Symbolic and Language Agnostic Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14199 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14199/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 2 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Distributional Semantics and Linguistic Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.01896/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We argue that the relative success of large language models (LLMs) is not a reflection on the symbolic vs. subsymbolic debate but a reflection on employing an appropriate strategy of bottom-up reverse engineering of language at scale. However, due to the subsymbolic nature of these models whatever knowledge these systems acquire about language will always be buried in millions of microfeatures (weights) none of which is meaningful on its own. Moreover, and due to their stochastic nature, these models will often fail in capturing various inferential aspects that are prevalent in natural language. What we suggest here is employing the successful bottom-up strategy in a symbolic setting, producing symbolic, language agnostic and ontologically grounded large language models.