# Performance Comparison of Design Optimization and Deep Learning-based Inverse Design

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13000 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.13000/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00667/) (2022)
- [Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.1784/) (2014)
- [MelGAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Conditional Waveform Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.06711/) (2019)
- [A Literature Survey of Benchmark Functions For Global Optimization Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1308.4008/) (2013)
- [A deep-learning-based surrogate model for data assimilation in dynamic subsurface flow problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.05823/) (2019)
- [Physics-Guided Architecture (PGA) of Neural Networks for Quantifying Uncertainty in Lake Temperature Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02682/) (2019)
- [Multifunctional Metasurface Design with a Generative Adversarial Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04851/) (2019)
- [A Cyclical Deep Learning Based Framework For Simultaneous Inverse and Forward design of Nanophotonic Metasurfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12796/) (2020)
- [Deep Learning-Based Inverse Design for Engineering Systems: Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Automotive Brakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13309/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Surrogate model-based optimization has been increasingly used in the field of engineering design. It involves creating a surrogate model with objective functions or constraints based on the data obtained from simulations or real-world experiments, and then finding the optimal solution from the model using numerical optimization methods. Recent advancements in deep learning-based inverse design methods have made it possible to generate real-time optimal solutions for engineering design problems, eliminating the requirement for iterative optimization processes. Nevertheless, no comprehensive study has yet closely examined the specific advantages and disadvantages of this novel approach compared to the traditional design optimization method. The objective of this paper is to compare the performance of traditional design optimization methods with deep learning-based inverse design methods by employing benchmark problems across various scenarios. Based on the findings of this study, we provide guidelines that can be taken into account for the future utilization of deep learning-based inverse design. It is anticipated that these guidelines will enhance the practical applicability of this approach to real engineering design problems.