# Advancing Relation Extraction through Language Probing with Exemplars from Set Co-Expansion

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11720 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11720/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 29 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00190/) (2021)
- [The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08691/) (2021)
- [Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15723/) (2020)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.07676/) (2020)
- [SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10529/) (2019)
- [It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07118/) (2020)
- [QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06378/) (2021)
- [LUKE: Deep Contextualized Entity Representations with Entity-aware Self-attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01057/) (2020)
- [PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.11259/) (2021)
- [WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgramming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00121/) (2021)
- [How Many Data Points is a Prompt Worth?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.08493/) (2021)
- [Knowledgeable Prompt-tuning: Incorporating Knowledge into Prompt Verbalizer for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.02035/) (2021)
- [KnowPrompt: Knowledge-aware Prompt-tuning with Synergistic Optimization for Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07650/) (2021)
- [Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation with Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08824/) (2020)
- [Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05529/) (2019)
- [TACRED Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the TACRED Relation Extraction Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14855/) (2020)
- [Re-TACRED: Addressing Shortcomings of the TACRED Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08398/) (2021)
- [Prompt-Learning for Fine-Grained Entity Typing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.10604/) (2021)
- [PADA: Example-based Prompt Learning for on-the-fly Adaptation to Unseen Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12206/) (2021)
- [Question Answering on Freebase via Relation Extraction and Textual Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.00957/) (2016)
- [TaxoExpan: Self-supervised Taxonomy Expansion with Position-Enhanced Graph Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.09522/) (2020)
- [Fine-tuning Pre-Trained Transformer Language Models to Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08646/) (2019)
- [TaxoCom: Topic Taxonomy Completion with Hierarchical Discovery of Novel Topic Clusters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.06771/) (2022)
- [SetExpan: Corpus-Based Set Expansion via Context Feature Selection and Rank Ensemble](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.08192/) (2019)
- [Empower Entity Set Expansion via Language Model Probing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13897/) (2020)
- [Incorporating Structured Commonsense Knowledge in Story Completion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00625/) (2018)
- [Generative Prompt Tuning for Relation Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12435/) (2022)
- [Term Set Expansion based NLP Architect by Intel AI Lab](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08953/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Relation Extraction (RE) is a pivotal task in automatically extracting structured information from unstructured text. In this paper, we present a multi-faceted approach that integrates representative examples and through co-set expansion. The primary goal of our method is to enhance relation classification accuracy and mitigating confusion between contrastive classes. Our approach begins by seeding each relationship class with representative examples. Subsequently, our co-set expansion algorithm enriches training objectives by incorporating similarity measures between target pairs and representative pairs from the target class. Moreover, the co-set expansion process involves a class ranking procedure that takes into account exemplars from contrastive classes. Contextual details encompassing relation mentions are harnessed via context-free Hearst patterns to ascertain contextual similarity. Empirical evaluation demonstrates the efficacy of our co-set expansion approach, resulting in a significant enhancement of relation classification performance. Our method achieves an observed margin of at least 1 percent improvement in accuracy in most settings, on top of existing fine-tuning approaches. To further refine our approach, we conduct an in-depth analysis that focuses on tuning contrastive examples. This strategic selection and tuning effectively reduce confusion between classes sharing similarities, leading to a more precise classification process. Experimental results underscore the effectiveness of our proposed framework for relation extraction. The synergy between co-set expansion and context-aware prompt tuning substantially contributes to improved classification accuracy. Furthermore, the reduction in confusion between contrastive classes through contrastive examples tuning validates the robustness and reliability of our method.