# Using ChatGPT as a CAT tool in Easy Language translation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11563 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11563/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04023/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14520/) (2023)
- [How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09210/) (2023)
- [Controllable Sentence Simplification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.02677/) (2019)
- [Controllable Text Simplification with Explicit Paraphrasing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11004/) (2020)
- [ChatGPT vs Human-authored Text: Insights into Controllable Text Summarization and Sentence Style Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07799/) (2023)
- [Language Models for German Text Simplification: Overcoming Parallel Data Scarcity through Style-specific Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12908/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [German Text Simplification: Finetuning Large Language Models with Semi-Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10675/) (2024)
- [Facilitating Cognitive Accessibility with LLMs: A Multi-Task Approach to Easy-to-Read Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00662/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study sets out to investigate the feasibility of using ChatGPT to translate citizen-oriented administrative texts into German Easy Language, a simplified, controlled language variety that is adapted to the needs of people with reading impairments. We use ChatGPT to translate selected texts from websites of German public authorities using two strategies, i.e. linguistic and holistic. We analyse the quality of the generated texts based on different criteria, such as correctness, readability, and syntactic complexity. The results indicated that the generated texts are easier than the standard texts, but that they still do not fully meet the established Easy Language standards. Additionally, the content is not always rendered correctly.