# Recap: Detecting Deepfake Video with Unpredictable Tampered Traces via Recovering Faces and Mapping Recovered Faces

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.09921 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09921/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 38 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06377/) (2021)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12602/) (2022)
- [FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08971/) (2019)
- [CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for now](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.11035/) (2019)
- [Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14808/) (2020)
- [Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12962/) (2019)
- [Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Clues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.09355/) (2020)
- [Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.13458/) (2019)
- [MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.00888/) (2018)
- [Multi-attentional Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.02406/) (2021)
- [Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08376/) (2022)
- [Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Poses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00661/) (2018)
- [Lips Don't Lie: A Generalisable and Robust Approach to Face Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07657/) (2020)
- [What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalize](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.10588/) (2020)
- [Deep Facial Expression Recognition: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08348/) (2018)
- [Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12376/) (2021)
- [Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01856/) (2021)
- [WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.01456/) (2021)
- [Capsule-Forensics: Using Capsule Networks to Detect Forged Images and Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.11215/) (2018)
- [Learning Self-Consistency for Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09311/) (2020)
- [Self-supervised Learning of Adversarial Example: Towards Good Generalizations for Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12208/) (2022)
- [Exploring Temporal Coherence for More General Video Face Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06693/) (2021)
- [Frequency-aware Discriminative Feature Learning Supervised by Single-Center Loss for Face Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.09096/) (2021)
- [Leveraging Real Talking Faces via Self-Supervision for Robust Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.07131/) (2022)
- [Recurrent Convolutional Strategies for Face Manipulation Detection in Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00582/) (2019)
- [Emotions Don't Lie: An Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection Method Using Affective Cues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.06711/) (2020)
- [Local Relation Learning for Face Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.02577/) (2021)
- [Dual Contrastive Learning for General Face Forgery Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.13522/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The exploitation of Deepfake techniques for malicious intentions has driven significant research interest in Deepfake detection. Deepfake manipulations frequently introduce random tampered traces, leading to unpredictable outcomes in different facial regions. However, existing detection methods heavily rely on specific forgery indicators, and as the forgery mode improves, these traces become increasingly randomized, resulting in a decline in the detection performance of methods reliant on specific forgery traces. To address the limitation, we propose Recap, a novel Deepfake detection model that exposes unspecific facial part inconsistencies by recovering faces and enlarges the differences between real and fake by mapping recovered faces. In the recovering stage, the model focuses on randomly masking regions of interest (ROIs) and reconstructing real faces without unpredictable tampered traces, resulting in a relatively good recovery effect for real faces while a poor recovery effect for fake faces. In the mapping stage, the output of the recovery phase serves as supervision to guide the facial mapping process. This mapping process strategically emphasizes the mapping of fake faces with poor recovery, leading to a further deterioration in their representation, while enhancing and refining the mapping of real faces with good representation. As a result, this approach significantly amplifies the discrepancies between real and fake videos. Our extensive experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate that Recap is effective in multiple scenarios.