# Utilizing Semantic Textual Similarity for Clinical Survey Data Feature Selection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.09892 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09892/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 26 of its 63 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00751/) (2019)
- [Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.07909/) (2015)
- [HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03771/) (2019)
- [Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.13138/) (2022)
- [Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10964/) (2020)
- [Domain-Specific Language Model Pretraining for Biomedical Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.15779/) (2020)
- [Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.03323/) (2019)
- [SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.00055/) (2017)
- [Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.10959/) (2018)
- [BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Mining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10341/) (2022)
- [FastText.zip: Compressing text classification models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.03651/) (2016)
- [TabLLM: Few-shot Classification of Tabular Data with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10723/) (2022)
- [GatorTron: A Large Clinical Language Model to Unlock Patient Information from Unstructured Electronic Health Records](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03540/) (2022)
- [Byte Pair Encoding is Suboptimal for Language Model Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03720/) (2020)
- [Do We Still Need Clinical Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08091/) (2023)
- [MedSTS: A Resource for Clinical Semantic Textual Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09397/) (2018)
- [Style-transfer and Paraphrase: Looking for a Sensible Semantic Similarity Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05001/) (2020)
- [An Overview on Language Models: Recent Developments and Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05759/) (2023)
- [Nested cross-validation when selecting classifiers is overzealous for most practical applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09446/) (2018)
- [Benchmarking Relief-Based Feature Selection Methods for Bioinformatics Data Mining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.08477/) (2017)
- [Machine learning approach for early detection of autism by combining questionnaire and home video screening](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06076/) (2017)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [LLM-Powered Decentralized Generative Agents with Adaptive Hierarchical Knowledge Graph for Cooperative Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05453/) (2025)
- [GraphLit: Learning Text-Enriched Dynamic Character Network Representations for Literary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28643/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Survey data can contain a high number of features while having a comparatively low quantity of examples. Machine learning models that attempt to predict outcomes from survey data under these conditions can overfit and result in poor generalizability. One remedy to this issue is feature selection, which attempts to select an optimal subset of features to learn upon. A relatively unexplored source of information in the feature selection process is the usage of textual names of features, which may be semantically indicative of which features are relevant to a target outcome. The relationships between feature names and target names can be evaluated using language models (LMs) to produce semantic textual similarity (STS) scores, which can then be used to select features. We examine the performance using STS to select features directly and in the minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance (mRMR) algorithm. The performance of STS as a feature selection metric is evaluated against preliminary survey data collected as a part of a clinical study on persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP). The results suggest that features selected with STS can result in higher performance models compared to traditional feature selection algorithms.
