# Large Language Models at Work in China's Labor Market

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08776 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08776/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infilling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10360/) (2021)
- [GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02414/) (2022)
- [Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02406/) (2015)
- [Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07809/) (2017)
- [The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06590/) (2023)
- [GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.10130/) (2023)
- [To Compress or Not to Compress- Self-Supervised Learning and Information Theory: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09355/) (2023)
- [When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08807/) (2017)
- [Exposure of occupations to technologies of the fourth industrial revolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13317/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [The Career Interests of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08564/) (2024)
- [Chinese Labor Law Large Language Model Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09972/) (2026)
- [Generative AI impacts on intra-urban inequality and skill premium in Beijing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25505/) (2026)
- [Generative Models Erode Human Temporal Learning Through Market Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06572/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper explores the potential impacts of large language models (LLMs) on the Chinese labor market. We analyze occupational exposure to LLM capabilities by incorporating human expertise and LLM classifications, following the methodology of Eloundou et al. (2023). The results indicate a positive correlation between occupational exposure and both wage levels and experience premiums at the occupation level. This suggests that higher-paying and experience-intensive jobs may face greater exposure risks from LLM-powered software. We then aggregate occupational exposure at the industry level to obtain industrial exposure scores. Both occupational and industrial exposure scores align with expert assessments. Our empirical analysis also demonstrates a distinct impact of LLMs, which deviates from the routinization hypothesis. We present a stylized theoretical framework to better understand this deviation from previous digital technologies. By incorporating entropy-based information theory into the task-based framework, we propose an AI learning theory that reveals a different pattern of LLM impacts compared to the routinization hypothesis.
