# Handwritten Stenography Recognition and the LION Dataset

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.07799 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07799/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 58 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03167/) (2015)
- [Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.3555/) (2014)
- [Batch Renormalization: Towards Reducing Minibatch Dependence in Batch-Normalized Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.03275/) (2017)
- [Pay Attention to What You Read: Non-recurrent Handwritten Text-Line Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.13044/) (2020)
- [Evaluating Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Handwritten Text Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.07377/) (2019)
- [OrigamiNet: Weakly-Supervised, Segmentation-Free, One-Step, Full Page Text Recognition by learning to unfold](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07491/) (2020)
- [Joint Line Segmentation and Transcription for End-to-End Handwritten Paragraph Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.08352/) (2016)
- [An Efficient End-to-End Neural Model for Handwritten Text Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.07965/) (2018)
- [A Few-shot Learning Approach for Historical Ciphered Manuscript Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.12577/) (2020)
- [Paired Image to Image Translation for Strikethrough Removal From Handwritten Words](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.09633/) (2022)
- [A Study of Augmentation Methods for Handwritten Stenography Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.02761/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: In this paper, we establish a baseline for handwritten stenography recognition, using the novel LION dataset, and investigate the impact of including selected aspects of stenographic theory into the recognition process. We make the LION dataset publicly available with the aim of encouraging future research in handwritten stenography recognition. Methods: A state-of-the-art text recognition model is trained to establish a baseline. Stenographic domain knowledge is integrated by applying four different encoding methods that transform the target sequence into representations, which approximate selected aspects of the writing system. Results are further improved by integrating a pre-training scheme, based on synthetic data. Results: The baseline model achieves an average test character error rate (CER) of 29.81% and a word error rate (WER) of 55.14%. Test error rates are reduced significantly by combining stenography-specific target sequence encodings with pre-training and fine-tuning, yielding CERs in the range of 24.5% - 26% and WERs of 44.8% - 48.2%. Conclusion: The obtained results demonstrate the challenging nature of stenography recognition. Integrating stenography-specific knowledge, in conjunction with pre-training and fine-tuning on synthetic data, yields considerable improvements. Together with our precursor study on the subject, this is the first work to apply modern handwritten text recognition to stenography. The dataset and our code are publicly available via Zenodo.