# How Good Are SOTA Fake News Detectors

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02727 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02727/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08237/) (2019)
- [DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03654/) (2020)
- [Defending Against Neural Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12616/) (2019)
- ["Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.00648/) (2017)
- [Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.01967/) (2017)
- [Funnel-Transformer: Filtering out Sequential Redundancy for Efficient Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03236/) (2020)
- [COVID-Twitter-BERT: A Natural Language Processing Model to Analyse COVID-19 Content on Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07503/) (2020)
- [Transformer based Automatic COVID-19 Fake News Detection System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00180/) (2021)
- [Simplistic Collection and Labeling Practices Limit the Utility of Benchmark Datasets for Twitter Bot Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07015/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Disinformation Detection: An Evolving Challenge in the Age of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15847/) (2023)
- [A Comparative Study of Hybrid Models in Health Misinformation Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06311/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic fake news detection with machine learning can prevent the dissemination of false statements before they gain many views. Several datasets labeling statements as legitimate or false have been created since the 2016 United States presidential election for the prospect of training machine learning models. We evaluate the robustness of both traditional and deep state-of-the-art models to gauge how well they may perform in the real world. We find that traditional models tend to generalize better to data outside the distribution it was trained on compared to more recently-developed large language models, though the best model to use may depend on the specific task at hand.