# Learning Spatial Distribution of Long-Term Trackers Scores

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01256 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01256/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01497/) (2015)
- [You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02640/) (2015)
- [Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0473/) (2014)
- [Argoverse: 3D Tracking and Forecasting with Rich Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02620/) (2019)
- [SiamRPN++: Evolution of Siamese Visual Tracking with Very Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.11703/) (2018)
- [Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.17154/) (2021)
- [Learning Discriminative Model Prediction for Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.07220/) (2019)
- [Nearly-tight VC-dimension and pseudodimension bounds for piecewise linear neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.02930/) (2017)
- [CrowdHuman: A Benchmark for Detecting Human in a Crowd](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.00123/) (2018)
- [Fast Online Object Tracking and Segmentation: A Unifying Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05050/) (2018)
- [Learning Multi-Domain Convolutional Neural Networks for Visual Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.07945/) (2015)
- [SiamFC++: Towards Robust and Accurate Visual Tracking with Target Estimation Guidelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.06188/) (2019)
- [Siam R-CNN: Visual Tracking by Re-Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.12836/) (2019)
- [Learning Target Candidate Association to Keep Track of What Not to Track](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16556/) (2021)
- [CityFlow: A City-Scale Benchmark for Multi-Target Multi-Camera Vehicle Tracking and Re-Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.09254/) (2019)
- [Monocular Quasi-Dense 3D Object Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07351/) (2021)
- [The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1507.00473/) (2015)
- [Robust Visual Tracking by Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11191/) (2022)
- [Online Adaptive Hidden Markov Model for Multi-Tracker Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1504.06103/) (2015)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Long-Term tracking is a hot topic in Computer Vision. In this context, competitive models are presented every year, showing a constant growth rate in performances, mainly measured in standardized protocols as Visual Object Tracking (VOT) and Object Tracking Benchmark (OTB). Fusion-trackers strategy has been applied over last few years for overcoming the known re-detection problem, turning out to be an important breakthrough. Following this approach, this work aims to generalize the fusion concept to an arbitrary number of trackers used as baseline trackers in the pipeline, leveraging a learning phase to better understand how outcomes correlate with each other, even when no target is present. A model and data independence conjecture will be evidenced in the manuscript, yielding a recall of 0.738 on LTB-50 dataset when learning from VOT-LT2022, and 0.619 by reversing the two datasets. In both cases, results are strongly competitive with state-of-the-art and recall turns out to be the first on the podium.