# SelfCheck: Using LLMs to Zero-Shot Check Their Own Step-by-Step Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00436 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00436/

## Key facts

- Cited by 159 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 19 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03654/) (2020)
- [PaLM 2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10403/) (2023)
- [MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13319/) (2019)
- [Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12813/) (2023)
- [Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13379/) (2023)
- [REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01904/) (2023)
- [Deductive Verification of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03872/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Hub: A Continuous Effort to Measure Large Language Models' Reasoning Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17306/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 159)

- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07864/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11495/) (2023)
- [From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17419/) (2025)
- [LLM Self Defense: By Self Examination, LLMs Know They Are Being Tricked](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07308/) (2023)
- [When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01297/) (2024)
- [ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08967/) (2024)
- [Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03188/) (2023)
- [Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00212/) (2025)
- [Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and Future](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15402/) (2023)
- [O1 Replication Journey: A Strategic Progress Report -- Part 1](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18982/) (2024)
- [AgentCF: Collaborative Learning with Autonomous Language Agents for Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09233/) (2023)
- [Confidence Improves Self-Consistency in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06233/) (2025)
- [LLMs cannot find reasoning errors, but can correct them given the error location](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08516/) (2023)
- [Formal Mathematical Reasoning: A New Frontier in AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16075/) (2024)
- [Plan-on-Graph: Self-Correcting Adaptive Planning of Large Language Model on Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23875/) (2024)
- [The Benefits of a Concise Chain of Thought on Problem-Solving in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05618/) (2024)
- [Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.17017/) (2024)
- [Nova: An Iterative Planning and Search Approach to Enhance Novelty and Diversity of LLM Generated Ideas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14255/) (2024)
- [Hume: Introducing System-2 Thinking in Visual-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21432/) (2025)
- [Evaluating LLMs at Detecting Errors in LLM Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03602/) (2024)
- [Usable XAI: 10 Strategies Towards Exploiting Explainability in the LLM Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08946/) (2024)
- [Jailbreaking Large Language Models Against Moderation Guardrails via Cipher Characters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20413/) (2024)
- [A Closer Look at the Self-Verification Abilities of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07954/) (2023)
- [Think Twice Before Trusting: Self-Detection for Large Language Models through Comprehensive Answer Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09972/) (2024)
- [Evaluation Agent: Efficient and Promptable Evaluation Framework for Visual Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09645/) (2024)
- [SuperCorrect: Advancing Small LLM Reasoning with Thought Template Distillation and Self-Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09008/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.12472/) (2024)
- [Self-Reflection in LLM Agents: Effects on Problem-Solving Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06682/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Key Condition Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14092/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The recent progress in large language models (LLMs), especially the invention of chain-of-thought prompting, has made it possible to automatically answer questions by stepwise reasoning. However, when faced with more complicated problems that require non-linear thinking, even the strongest LLMs make mistakes. To address this, we explore whether LLMs are able to recognize errors in their own step-by-step reasoning, without resorting to external resources. To this end, we propose SelfCheck, a general-purpose zero-shot verification schema for recognizing such errors. We then use the results of these checks to improve question-answering performance by conducting weighted voting on multiple solutions to the question. We test SelfCheck on three datasets (GSM8K, MathQA, and MATH) and find that it successfully recognizes errors and, in turn, increases final answer accuracies.