# Adversarially Robust Neural Legal Judgement Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00165 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00165/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12848/) (2019)
- [Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11932/) (2019)
- [BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09984/) (2020)
- [Universal Sentence Encoder](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11175/) (2018)
- [BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.01970/) (2020)
- [LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00976/) (2021)
- [Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02059/) (2019)
- [CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.02478/) (2018)
- [Counter-fitting Word Vectors to Linguistic Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.00892/) (2016)
- [Towards Improving Adversarial Training of NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00544/) (2021)
- [ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.13562/) (2021)
- [Paragraph-level Rationale Extraction through Regularization: A case study on European Court of Human Rights Cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.13084/) (2021)
- [Swiss-Judgment-Prediction: A Multilingual Legal Judgment Prediction Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00806/) (2021)
- [Building Legal Case Retrieval Systems with Lexical Matching and Summarization using A Pre-Trained Phrase Scoring Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.14083/) (2020)
- [Searching for a Search Method: Benchmarking Search Algorithms for Generating NLP Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.06368/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Evaluating the Limits of Large Language Models in Multilingual Legal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22472/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Legal judgment prediction is the task of predicting the outcome of court cases on a given text description of facts of cases. These tasks apply Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to predict legal judgment results based on facts. Recently, large-scale public datasets and NLP models have increased research in areas related to legal judgment prediction systems. For such systems to be practically helpful, they should be robust from adversarial attacks. Previous works mainly focus on making a neural legal judgement system; however, significantly less or no attention has been given to creating a robust Legal Judgement Prediction(LJP) system. We implemented adversarial attacks on early existing LJP systems and found that none of them could handle attacks. In this work, we proposed an approach for making robust LJP systems. Extensive experiments on three legal datasets show significant improvements in our approach over the state-of-the-art LJP system in handling adversarial attacks. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to increase the robustness of early-existing LJP systems.