# Towards Trustworthy and Aligned Machine Learning: A Data-centric Survey with Causality Perspectives

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16851 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16851/

## Key facts

- Cited by 30 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 263 of its 673 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Reward modeling and RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/reward-modeling-and-rlhf/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 263)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06125/) (2022)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12092/) (2021)
- [Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00751/) (2019)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Survey of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Revealed by Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10844/) (2023)
- [SNIFFER: Multimodal Large Language Model for Explainable Out-of-Context Misinformation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03170/) (2024)
- [JailbreakZoo: Survey, Landscapes, and Horizons in Jailbreaking Large Language and Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01599/) (2024)
- [Boosting Jailbreak Attack with Momentum](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01229/) (2024)
- [On Behalf of the Stakeholders: Trends in NLP Model Interpretability in the Era of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19200/) (2024)
- [Towards Adversarially Robust Dataset Distillation by Curvature Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10045/) (2024)
- [Exploring the Robustness of In-Context Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18191/) (2024)
- [Evaluation Awareness Scales Predictably in Open-Weights Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13333/) (2025)
- [Discover and Mitigate Multiple Biased Subgroups in Image Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12777/) (2024)
- [SALT: Steering Activations towards Leakage-free Thinking in Chain of Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07772/) (2025)
- [Distilling Out-of-Distribution Robustness from Vision-Language Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01441/) (2023)
- [FRIT: Using Causal Importance to Improve Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13334/) (2025)
- [Trustworthy Machine Learning via Memorization and the Granular Long-Tail: A Survey on Interactions, Tradeoffs, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07501/) (2025)
- [Causality from Bottom to Top: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11219/) (2024)
- [When Graph Neural Network Meets Causality: Opportunities, Methodologies and An Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12477/) (2023)
- [CHG Shapley: Efficient Data Valuation and Selection towards Trustworthy Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11730/) (2024)
- [Alignment-Constrained Dynamic Pruning for LLMs: Identifying and Preserving Alignment-Critical Circuits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07482/) (2025)
- [Causality Is Key to Understand and Balance Multiple Goals in Trustworthy ML and Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.21123/) (2025)
- [Amortized Latent Steering: Low-Cost Alternative to Test-Time Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18116/) (2025)
- [Hierarchical Invariance for Robust and Interpretable Vision Tasks at Larger Scales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15430/) (2024)
- [Measuring Error Alignment for Decision-Making Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13919/) (2024)
- [Beyond Accuracy: What Matters in Designing Well-Behaved Image Classification Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17110/) (2025)
- [Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02640/) (2026)
- [Trustworthy Large Models in Vision: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09680/) (2023)
- [Choosing Wisely and Learning Deeply: Selective Cross-Modality Distillation via CLIP for Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15145/) (2023)
- [Approximate Nullspace Augmented Finetuning for Robust Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10476/) (2024)
- [Causal Perception Inspired Representation Learning for Trustworthy Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19567/) (2024)
- [Quantitative Evaluation of the Saliency Map for Alzheimer's Disease Classifier with Anatomical Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08546/) (2024)
- [Synthetic Data-Driven Prompt Tuning for Financial QA over Tables and Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.06292/) (2025)
- [Stabilizing Multi-Attack Adversarial Training via Bandit Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.12265/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The trustworthiness of machine learning has emerged as a critical topic in the field, encompassing various applications and research areas such as robustness, security, interpretability, and fairness. The last decade saw the development of numerous methods addressing these challenges. In this survey, we systematically review these advancements from a data-centric perspective, highlighting the shortcomings of traditional empirical risk minimization (ERM) training in handling challenges posed by the data. Interestingly, we observe a convergence of these methods, despite being developed independently across trustworthy machine learning subfields. Pearl's hierarchy of causality offers a unifying framework for these techniques. Accordingly, this survey presents the background of trustworthy machine learning development using a unified set of concepts, connects this language to Pearl's causal hierarchy, and finally discusses methods explicitly inspired by causality literature. We provide a unified language with mathematical vocabulary to link these methods across robustness, adversarial robustness, interpretability, and fairness, fostering a more cohesive understanding of the field. Further, we explore the trustworthiness of large pretrained models. After summarizing dominant techniques like fine-tuning, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, prompting, and reinforcement learning with human feedback, we draw connections between them and the standard ERM. This connection allows us to build upon the principled understanding of trustworthy methods, extending it to these new techniques in large pretrained models, paving the way for future methods. Existing methods under this perspective are also reviewed. Lastly, we offer a brief summary of the applications of these methods and discuss potential future aspects related to our survey. For more information, please visit http://trustai.one.