# Mispronunciation detection using self-supervised speech representations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16324 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16324/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11477/) (2020)
- [HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Units](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07447/) (2021)
- [WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13900/) (2021)
- [SUPERB: Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.01051/) (2021)
- [LightHuBERT: Lightweight and Configurable Speech Representation Learning with Once-for-All Hidden-Unit BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15610/) (2022)
- [Transformer-Based Multi-Aspect Multi-Granularity Non-Native English Speaker Pronunciation Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.03432/) (2022)
- [Context-aware Goodness of Pronunciation for Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.08647/) (2020)
- [Analysis and Comparison of Classification Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.05355/) (2022)
- [A transfer learning based approach for pronunciation scoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.00976/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, self-supervised learning (SSL) models have produced promising results in a variety of speech-processing tasks, especially in contexts of data scarcity. In this paper, we study the use of SSL models for the task of mispronunciation detection for second language learners. We compare two downstream approaches: 1) training the model for phone recognition (PR) using native English data, and 2) training a model directly for the target task using non-native English data. We compare the performance of these two approaches for various SSL representations as well as a representation extracted from a traditional DNN-based speech recognition model. We evaluate the models on L2Arctic and EpaDB, two datasets of non-native speech annotated with pronunciation labels at the phone level. Overall, we find that using a downstream model trained for the target task gives the best performance and that most upstream models perform similarly for the task.
