# RoCar: A Relationship Network-based Evaluation Method for Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15997 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15997/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03109/) (2023)
- [GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infilling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10360/) (2021)
- [GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02414/) (2022)
- [AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06364/) (2023)
- [C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08322/) (2023)
- [Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12474/) (2023)
- [HuaTuo: Tuning LLaMA Model with Chinese Medical Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06975/) (2023)
- [DoctorGLM: Fine-tuning your Chinese Doctor is not a Herculean Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01097/) (2023)
- [Chatlaw: A Multi-Agent Legal Assistant based on a Role-Aligned Mixture-of-Experts Architecture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16092/) (2023)
- [Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10436/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have received increasing attention. However, due to the complexity of its capabilities, how to rationally evaluate the capabilities of LLMs is still a task to be solved. We propose the RoCar method, which utilizes the defined basic schemas to randomly construct a task graph and generates natural language evaluation tasks based on the task graph to evaluate the reasoning and memory abilities of LLMs respectively. Due to the very large randomness of the task construction process, it is possible to ensure that none of the LLMs to be tested has directly learned the evaluation tasks, guaranteeing the fairness of the evaluation method.