# Learning-based Control for PMSM Using Distributed Gaussian Processes with Optimal Aggregation Strategy

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13945 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13945/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [When Gaussian Process Meets Big Data: A Review of Scalable GPs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.01065/) (2018)
- [Distributed Gaussian Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.02843/) (2015)
- [Generalized Product of Experts for Automatic and Principled Fusion of Gaussian Process Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1410.7827/) (2014)
- [Uniform Error Bounds for Gaussian Process Regression with Application to Safe Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01376/) (2019)
- [Efficient Optimization for Sparse Gaussian Process Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1310.6007/) (2013)
- [Can Learning Deteriorate Control? Analyzing Computational Delays in Gaussian Process-Based Event-Triggered Online Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08169/) (2023)
- [Distributed Learning Consensus Control for Unknown Nonlinear Multi-Agent Systems based on Gaussian Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15929/) (2021)
- [Cooperative Online Learning for Multi-Agent System Control via Gaussian Processes with Event-Triggered Mechanism: Extended Version](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05138/) (2023)
- [Networked Online Learning for Control of Safety-Critical Resource-Constrained Systems based on Gaussian Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11491/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Whom to Trust? Elective Learning for Distributed Gaussian Process Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03014/) (2024)
- [Decentralized Event-Triggered Online Learning for Safe Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Gaussian Process Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03174/) (2024)
- [Event-triggered Control and Online Learning for Networked Systems under Computational Delays](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29576/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The growing demand for accurate control in varying and unknown environments has sparked a corresponding increase in the requirements for power supply components, including permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs). To infer the unknown part of the system, machine learning techniques are widely employed, especially Gaussian process regression (GPR) due to its flexibility of continuous system modeling and its guaranteed performance. For practical implementation, distributed GPR is adopted to alleviate the high computational complexity. However, the study of distributed GPR from a control perspective remains an open problem. In this paper, a control-aware optimal aggregation strategy of distributed GPR for PMSMs is proposed based on the Lyapunov stability theory. This strategy exclusively leverages the posterior mean, thereby obviating the need for computationally intensive calculations associated with posterior variance in alternative approaches. Moreover, the straightforward calculation process of our proposed strategy lends itself to seamless implementation in high-frequency PMSM control. The effectiveness of the proposed strategy is demonstrated in the simulations.
