# Towards AI Transparency and Accountability: A Global Framework for Exchanging Information on AI Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13658 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13658/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Datasheets for Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09010/) (2018)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [Model Cards for Model Reporting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03993/) (2018)
- [A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01933/) (2018)
- [Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02508/) (2019)
- [The Road to Explainability is Paved with Bias: Measuring the Fairness of Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.03295/) (2022)
- [Marrying Fairness and Explainability in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02947/) (2022)
- [Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Act](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13701/) (2023)
- [Learning from Discriminatory Training Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.08189/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose that future AI transparency and accountability regulations are based on an open global standard for exchanging information about AI systems, which allows co-existence of potentially conflicting local regulations. Then, we discuss key components of a lightweight and effective AI transparency and/or accountability regulation. To prevent overregulation, the proposed approach encourages collaboration between regulators and industry to create a scalable and cost-efficient mutually beneficial solution. This includes using automated assessments and benchmarks with results transparently communicated through AI cards in an open AI register to facilitate meaningful public comparisons of competing AI systems. Such AI cards should report standardized measures tailored to the specific high-risk applications of AI systems and could be used for conformity assessments under AI transparency and accountability policies such as the European Union's AI Act.