# Does Circuit Analysis Interpretability Scale? Evidence from Multiple Choice Capabilities in Chinchilla

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09458 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09458/

## Key facts

- Cited by 149 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 54 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.02860/) (2019)
- [Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00593/) (2022)
- [Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03286/) (2022)
- [Toy Models of Superposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10652/) (2022)
- [In-context Learning and Induction Heads](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11895/) (2022)
- [Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14275/) (2022)
- [Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.05217/) (2023)
- [Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10650/) (2019)
- [Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14997/) (2023)
- [Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08112/) (2023)
- [Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14680/) (2022)
- [Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14375/) (2022)
- [Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14767/) (2023)
- [Causal Abstractions of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02997/) (2021)
- [AI safety via debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.00899/) (2018)
- [Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05802/) (2022)
- [Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01610/) (2023)
- [Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01820/) (2019)
- [Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.02536/) (2023)
- [Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04709/) (2023)
- [Language model compression with weighted low-rank factorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00112/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 149)

- [Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14082/) (2024)
- [Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16042/) (2023)
- [Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.01029/) (2023)
- [Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06102/) (2024)
- [How to use and interpret activation patching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15255/) (2024)
- [Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10348/) (2023)
- [Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11944/) (2024)
- [Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16837/) (2024)
- [Fine-Tuning Enhances Existing Mechanisms: A Case Study on Entity Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14811/) (2024)
- [Have Faith in Faithfulness: Going Beyond Circuit Overlap When Finding Model Mechanisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17806/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Open Research Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05563/) (2024)
- [A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02646/) (2024)
- [Round and Round We Go! What makes Rotary Positional Encodings useful?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06205/) (2024)
- [Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01761/) (2024)
- [AtP*: An efficient and scalable method for localizing LLM behaviour to components](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00745/) (2024)
- [Circuit Component Reuse Across Tasks in Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08744/) (2023)
- [Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.08366/) (2024)
- [A Primer on the Inner Workings of Transformer-based Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00208/) (2024)
- [From Individual to Society: A Survey on Social Simulation Driven by Large Language Model-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03563/) (2024)
- [Is This the Subspace You Are Looking for? An Interpretability Illusion for Subspace Activation Patching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17030/) (2023)
- [RAVEL: Evaluating Interpretability Methods on Disentangling Language Model Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17700/) (2024)
- [On the Role of Attention Heads in Large Language Model Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13708/) (2024)
- [Attention Heads of Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.03752/) (2024)
- [LLM Circuit Analyses Are Consistent Across Training and Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10827/) (2024)
- [Finding Transformer Circuits with Edge Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16778/) (2024)
- [LoFiT: Localized Fine-tuning on LLM Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01563/) (2024)
- [Confidence Regulation Neurons in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16254/) (2024)
- [MIB: A Mechanistic Interpretability Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13151/) (2025)
- [From Yes-Men to Truth-Tellers: Addressing Sycophancy in Large Language Models with Pinpoint Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01658/) (2024)
- [Identifying Semantic Induction Heads to Understand In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13055/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Circuit analysis is a promising technique for understanding the internal mechanisms of language models. However, existing analyses are done in small models far from the state of the art. To address this, we present a case study of circuit analysis in the 70B Chinchilla model, aiming to test the scalability of circuit analysis. In particular, we study multiple-choice question answering, and investigate Chinchilla's capability to identify the correct answer label given knowledge of the correct answer text. We find that the existing techniques of logit attribution, attention pattern visualization, and activation patching naturally scale to Chinchilla, allowing us to identify and categorize a small set of `output nodes' (attention heads and MLPs). We further study the `correct letter' category of attention heads aiming to understand the semantics of their features, with mixed results. For normal multiple-choice question answers, we significantly compress the query, key and value subspaces of the head without loss of performance when operating on the answer labels for multiple-choice questions, and we show that the query and key subspaces represent an `Nth item in an enumeration' feature to at least some extent. However, when we attempt to use this explanation to understand the heads' behaviour on a more general distribution including randomized answer labels, we find that it is only a partial explanation, suggesting there is more to learn about the operation of `correct letter' heads on multiple choice question answering.