# Benchmarking Algorithms for Federated Domain Generalization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04942 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04942/

## Key facts

- Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00667/) (2022)
- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.7766/) (2014)
- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [Invariant Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02893/) (2019)
- [Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05492/) (2016)
- [WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07421/) (2020)
- [Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08731/) (2019)
- [On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02189/) (2019)
- [Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.01719/) (2016)
- [Federated Learning with Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00582/) (2018)
- [In Search of Lost Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01434/) (2020)
- [Adaptive Federated Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00295/) (2020)
- [Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06335/) (2019)
- [LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01097/) (2018)
- [Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Little](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.09767/) (2018)
- [Agnostic Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00146/) (2019)
- [Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.05271/) (2018)
- [Bayesian Nonparametric Federated Learning of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12022/) (2019)
- [FedDG: Federated Domain Generalization on Medical Image Segmentation via Episodic Learning in Continuous Frequency Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06030/) (2021)
- [Parallel Restarted SGD with Faster Convergence and Less Communication: Demystifying Why Model Averaging Works for Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.06629/) (2018)
- [Tighter Theory for Local SGD on Identical and Heterogeneous Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.04746/) (2019)
- [Gradient Matching for Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09937/) (2021)
- [Adversarial Domain Adaptation with Domain Mixup](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01805/) (2019)
- [Fishr: Invariant Gradient Variances for Out-of-Distribution Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.02934/) (2021)
- [Qsparse-local-SGD: Distributed SGD with Quantization, Sparsification, and Local Computations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02367/) (2019)
- [FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04620/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [DiPrompT: Disentangled Prompt Tuning for Multiple Latent Domain Generalization in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08506/) (2024)
- [DapperFL: Domain Adaptive Federated Learning with Model Fusion Pruning for Edge Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05823/) (2024)
- [Federated Unsupervised Domain Generalization using Global and Local Alignment of Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16304/) (2024)
- [Federated Domain Generalization with Data-free On-server Matching Gradient](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14653/) (2025)
- [From Invariant Representations to Invariant Data: Provable Robustness to Spurious Correlations via Noisy Counterfactual Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24843/) (2025)
- [Domain Generalization Under Posterior Drift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04441/) (2025)
- [FedCCRL: Federated Domain Generalization with Cross-Client Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11267/) (2024)
- [Overcoming label shift with target-aware federated learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03799/) (2024)
- [Federated Domain Generalization with Label Smoothing and Balanced Decentralized Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11408/) (2024)
- [Dataset Dictionary Learning in a Wasserstein Space for Federated Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11647/) (2024)
- [DBA-DFL: Towards Distributed Backdoor Attacks with Network Detection in Decentralized Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15005/) (2025)
- [PARDON: Privacy-Aware and Robust Federated Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22622/) (2024)
- [Decentralized Domain Generalization with Style Sharing: Formal Model and Convergence Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06235/) (2025)
- [HFedATM: Hierarchical Federated Domain Generalization via Optimal Transport and Regularized Mean Aggregation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05135/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While prior domain generalization (DG) benchmarks consider train-test dataset heterogeneity, we evaluate Federated DG which introduces federated learning (FL) specific challenges. Additionally, we explore domain-based heterogeneity in clients' local datasets - a realistic Federated DG scenario. Prior Federated DG evaluations are limited in terms of the number or heterogeneity of clients and dataset diversity. To address this gap, we propose an Federated DG benchmark methodology that enables control of the number and heterogeneity of clients and provides metrics for dataset difficulty. We then apply our methodology to evaluate 14 Federated DG methods, which include centralized DG methods adapted to the FL context, FL methods that handle client heterogeneity, and methods designed specifically for Federated DG. Our results suggest that despite some progress, there remain significant performance gaps in Federated DG particularly when evaluating with a large number of clients, high client heterogeneity, or more realistic datasets. Please check our extendable benchmark code here: https://github.com/inouye-lab/FedDG_Benchmark.