# Leveraging an Alignment Set in Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noise

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04868 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04868/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 40 of its 84 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06872/) (2018)
- [A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.05394/) (2017)
- [DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07394/) (2020)
- [Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.03683/) (2016)
- [MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05055/) (2017)
- [Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08199/) (2020)
- [Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.13554/) (2020)
- [Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.12088/) (2021)
- [Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05040/) (2019)
- [Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00189/) (2019)
- [Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.02819/) (2020)
- [SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensembling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01842/) (2019)
- [Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02347/) (2020)
- [Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.04966/) (2019)
- [Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Rates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03231/) (2019)
- [Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07805/) (2020)
- [Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03809/) (2019)
- [FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.11628/) (2021)
- [Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00445/) (2021)
- [Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.10077/) (2020)
- [Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04522/) (2021)
- [To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04149/) (2021)
- [Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00379/) (2020)
- [Confidence Scores Make Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning Possible](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.03772/) (2020)
- [Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predict](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06283/) (2021)
- [Learning with Bounded Instance- and Label-dependent Label Noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.03768/) (2017)
- [An Empirical Characterization of Fair Machine Learning For Clinical Risk Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.10306/) (2020)
- [Fairness in Biometrics: a figure of merit to assess biometric verification systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.02395/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Deep learning with noisy labels in medical prediction problems: a scoping review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13111/) (2024)
- [From Biased Selective Labels to Pseudo-Labels: An Expectation-Maximization Framework for Learning from Biased Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18865/) (2024)
- [GFLC: Graph-based Fairness-aware Label Correction for Fair Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15620/) (2025)
- [Conformal Margin Risk Minimization: An Envelope Framework for Robust Learning under Label Noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06468/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Noisy training labels can hurt model performance. Most approaches that aim to address label noise assume label noise is independent from the input features. In practice, however, label noise is often feature or textitinstance-dependent, and therefore biased (i.e., some instances are more likely to be mislabeled than others). E.g., in clinical care, female patients are more likely to be under-diagnosed for cardiovascular disease compared to male patients. Approaches that ignore this dependence can produce models with poor discriminative performance, and in many healthcare settings, can exacerbate issues around health disparities. In light of these limitations, we propose a two-stage approach to learn in the presence instance-dependent label noise. Our approach utilizes textitanchor points, a small subset of data for which we know the observed and ground truth labels. On several tasks, our approach leads to consistent improvements over the state-of-the-art in discriminative performance (AUROC) while mitigating bias (area under the equalized odds curve, AUEOC). For example, when predicting acute respiratory failure onset on the MIMIC-III dataset, our approach achieves a harmonic mean (AUROC and AUEOC) of 0.84 (SD [standard deviation] 0.01) while that of the next best baseline is 0.81 (SD 0.01). Overall, our approach improves accuracy while mitigating potential bias compared to existing approaches in the presence of instance-dependent label noise.
