# Enhancing the Robustness of QMIX against State-adversarial Attacks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00907 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00907/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02275/) (2017)
- [The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01955/) (2021)
- [The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.04043/) (2019)
- [Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08839/) (2020)
- [Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08938/) (2020)
- [Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.03632/) (2017)
- [Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal Adversary](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.08452/) (2021)
- [Delving into adversarial attacks on deep policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.06452/) (2017)
- [Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Adversarial Loss](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.01976/) (2020)
- [Who Is the Strongest Enemy? Towards Optimal and Efficient Evasion Attacks in Deep RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05087/) (2021)
- [On the Robustness of Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03722/) (2020)
- [What is the Solution for State-Adversarial Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.02705/) (2022)
- [Towards Comprehensive Testing on the Robustness of Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.07932/) (2022)
- [Sequential Attacks on Agents for Long-Term Adversarial Goals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12487/) (2018)
- [RoMFAC: A robust mean-field actor-critic reinforcement learning against adversarial perturbations on states](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07229/) (2022)
- [Sparse Adversarial Attack in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09362/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [PNAct: Crafting Backdoor Attacks in Safe Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.00485/) (2025)
- [Enhancing Security in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Survey on Adversarial Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20314/) (2025)
- [Distributionally Robust Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Robust Value Factorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11437/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) performance is generally impacted by state-adversarial attacks, a perturbation applied to an agent's observation. Most recent research has concentrated on robust single-agent reinforcement learning (SARL) algorithms against state-adversarial attacks. Still, there has yet to be much work on robust multi-agent reinforcement learning. Using QMIX, one of the popular cooperative multi-agent reinforcement algorithms, as an example, we discuss four techniques to improve the robustness of SARL algorithms and extend them to multi-agent scenarios. To increase the robustness of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms, we train models using a variety of attacks in this research. We then test the models taught using the other attacks by subjecting them to the corresponding attacks throughout the training phase. In this way, we organize and summarize techniques for enhancing robustness when used with MARL.
