# Morphological Inflection with Phonological Features

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12581 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.12581/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [The SIGMORPHON 2019 Shared Task: Morphological Analysis in Context and Cross-Lingual Transfer for Inflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11493/) (2019)
- [Applying the Transformer to Character-level Transduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.10213/) (2020)
- [The CoNLL--SIGMORPHON 2018 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.07125/) (2018)
- [CoNLL-SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection in 52 Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.09031/) (2017)
- [SIGMORPHON 2020 Shared Task 0: Typologically Diverse Morphological Inflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11572/) (2020)
- [Pushing the Limits of Low-Resource Morphological Inflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.05838/) (2019)
- [(Un)solving Morphological Inflection: Lemma Overlap Artificially Inflates Models' Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.05682/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent years have brought great advances into solving morphological tasks, mostly due to powerful neural models applied to various tasks as (re)inflection and analysis. Yet, such morphological tasks cannot be considered solved, especially when little training data is available or when generalizing to previously unseen lemmas. This work explores effects on performance obtained through various ways in which morphological models get access to subcharacter phonological features that are the targets of morphological processes. We design two methods to achieve this goal: one that leaves models as is but manipulates the data to include features instead of characters, and another that manipulates models to take phonological features into account when building representations for phonemes. We elicit phonemic data from standard graphemic data using language-specific grammars for languages with shallow grapheme-to-phoneme mapping, and we experiment with two reinflection models over eight languages. Our results show that our methods yield comparable results to the grapheme-based baseline overall, with minor improvements in some of the languages. All in all, we conclude that patterns in character distributions are likely to allow models to infer the underlying phonological characteristics, even when phonemes are not explicitly represented.