# A Multimodal Prototypical Approach for Unsupervised Sound Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12300 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.12300/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2023.

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Generative or Discriminative? Revisiting Text Classification in the Era of Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12181/) (2025)
- [Continual Audio-Visual Sound Separation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.02860/) (2024)
- [A sound description: Exploring prompt templates and class descriptions to enhance zero-shot audio classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13676/) (2024)
- [Text as Any-Modality for Zero-Shot Classification by Consistent Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06382/) (2025)
- [Domain Adaptation Method and Modality Gap Impact in Audio-Text Models for Prototypical Sound Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04376/) (2025)
- [The Hidden Cost of Modeling P(X): Vulnerability to Membership Inference Attacks in Generative Text Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16122/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In the context of environmental sound classification, the adaptability of systems is key: which sound classes are interesting depends on the context and the user's needs. Recent advances in text-to-audio retrieval allow for zero-shot audio classification, but performance compared to supervised models remains limited. This work proposes a multimodal prototypical approach that exploits local audio-text embeddings to provide more relevant answers to audio queries, augmenting the adaptability of sound detection in the wild. We do this by first using text to query a nearby community of audio embeddings that best characterize each query sound, and select the group's centroids as our prototypes. Second, we compare unseen audio to these prototypes for classification. We perform multiple ablation studies to understand the impact of the embedding models and prompts. Our unsupervised approach improves upon the zero-shot state-of-the-art in three sound recognition benchmarks by an average of 12%.
