# TrustGPT: A Benchmark for Trustworthy and Responsible Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11507 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11507/

## Key facts

- Cited by 58 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 43 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 43)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11462/) (2020)
- [A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00861/) (2021)
- [StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09456/) (2020)
- [GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02414/) (2022)
- [CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00133/) (2020)
- [BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08193/) (2021)
- [ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.09509/) (2022)
- [BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11718/) (2021)
- [SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10425/) (2023)
- [On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.10561/) (2019)
- [Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03891/) (2019)
- [Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05335/) (2023)
- [Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05197/) (2023)
- [Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03047/) (2023)
- [Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05733/) (2023)
- [Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07337/) (2019)
- [Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Norms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00620/) (2020)
- [Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06032/) (2020)
- [Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.03035/) (2019)
- [Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.11714/) (2018)
- [On Second Thought, Let's Not Think Step by Step! Bias and Toxicity in Zero-Shot Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08061/) (2022)
- [Challenges in Detoxifying Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07445/) (2021)
- ["I'm sorry to hear that": Finding New Biases in Language Models with a Holistic Descriptor Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09209/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 58)

- [A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03109/) (2023)
- [Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00770/) (2023)
- [From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16594/) (2024)
- [Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Opportunities of Large Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17177/) (2024)
- [Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07875/) (2023)
- [MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04788/) (2024)
- [Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02736/) (2024)
- [Large Language Model Alignment: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15025/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19736/) (2023)
- [Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13788/) (2023)
- [From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14851/) (2024)
- [Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05778/) (2024)
- [Navigating the Risks: A Survey of Security, Privacy, and Ethics Threats in LLM-Based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.09523/) (2024)
- [Large Language Model Safety: A Holistic Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17686/) (2024)
- [Decoding Compressed Trust: Scrutinizing the Trustworthiness of Efficient LLMs Under Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15447/) (2024)
- [ALI-Agent: Assessing LLMs' Alignment with Human Values via Agent-based Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14125/) (2024)
- [Can Large Language Models Understand Symbolic Graphics Programs?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08313/) (2024)
- [Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11166/) (2023)
- [SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12874/) (2024)
- [The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11094/) (2025)
- [Deconstructing The Ethics of Large Language Models from Long-standing Issues to New-emerging Dilemmas: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05392/) (2024)
- [DataGen: Unified Synthetic Dataset Generation via Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18966/) (2024)
- [HonestLLM: Toward an Honest and Helpful Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00380/) (2024)
- [CEB: Compositional Evaluation Benchmark for Fairness in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02408/) (2024)
- [Causal-Guided Active Learning for Debiasing Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12942/) (2024)
- [When Ethics and Payoffs Diverge: LLM Agents in Morally Charged Social Dilemmas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19212/) (2025)
- [PersoBench: Benchmarking Personalized Response Generation in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03198/) (2024)
- [Your Large Language Model is Secretly a Fairness Proponent and You Should Prompt it Like One](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12150/) (2024)
- [Cer-Eval: Certifiable and Cost-Efficient Evaluation Framework for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03814/) (2025)
- [BenchmarkCards: Standardized Documentation for Large Language Model Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12974/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, have gained significant attention due to their impressive natural language processing capabilities. It is crucial to prioritize human-centered principles when utilizing these models. Safeguarding the ethical and moral compliance of LLMs is of utmost importance. However, individual ethical issues have not been well studied on the latest LLMs. Therefore, this study aims to address these gaps by introducing a new benchmark -- TrustGPT. TrustGPT provides a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs in three crucial areas: toxicity, bias, and value-alignment. Initially, TrustGPT examines toxicity in language models by employing toxic prompt templates derived from social norms. It then quantifies the extent of bias in models by measuring quantifiable toxicity values across different groups. Lastly, TrustGPT assesses the value of conversation generation models from both active value-alignment and passive value-alignment tasks. Through the implementation of TrustGPT, this research aims to enhance our understanding of the performance of conversation generation models and promote the development of language models that are more ethical and socially responsible.