# Rethinking Document-Level Relation Extraction: A Reality Check

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08953 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08953/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 36 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [Graph Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10903/) (2017)
- [Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07082/) (2020)
- [Matching the Blanks: Distributional Similarity for Relation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03158/) (2019)
- [ScispaCy: Fast and Robust Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.07669/) (2019)
- [DocRED: A Large-Scale Document-Level Relation Extraction Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.06127/) (2019)
- [Document-Level Relation Extraction with Adaptive Thresholding and Localized Context Pooling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11304/) (2020)
- [Reasoning with Latent Structure Refinement for Document-Level Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.06312/) (2020)
- [Double Graph Based Reasoning for Document-level Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.13752/) (2020)
- [An Improved Baseline for Sentence-level Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01373/) (2021)
- [Document-level Relation Extraction as Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03618/) (2021)
- [Connecting the Dots: Document-level Neural Relation Extraction with Edge-oriented Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.00228/) (2019)
- [Entity Structure Within and Throughout: Modeling Mention Dependencies for Document-Level Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.10249/) (2021)
- [Probing for the Usage of Grammatical Number](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08831/) (2022)
- [Document-Level N-ary Relation Extraction with Multiscale Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02347/) (2019)
- [Global-to-Local Neural Networks for Document-Level Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10359/) (2020)
- [Fine-tune Bert for DocRED with Two-step Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11898/) (2019)
- [Document-Level Relation Extraction with Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.11384/) (2020)
- [Question Answering on Freebase via Relation Extraction and Textual Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.00957/) (2016)
- [Document-Level Relation Extraction with Adaptive Focal Loss and Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10900/) (2022)
- [Can Rationalization Improve Robustness?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.11790/) (2022)
- [An End-to-end Model for Entity-level Relation Extraction using Multi-instance Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05980/) (2021)
- [SIRE: Separate Intra- and Inter-sentential Reasoning for Document-level Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01709/) (2021)
- [Eider: Empowering Document-level Relation Extraction with Efficient Evidence Extraction and Inference-stage Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08657/) (2021)
- [HunFlair: An Easy-to-Use Tool for State-of-the-Art Biomedical Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.07347/) (2020)
- [Discriminative Reasoning for Document-level Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01562/) (2021)
- [A sequence-to-sequence approach for document-level relation extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01098/) (2022)
- [SAIS: Supervising and Augmenting Intermediate Steps for Document-Level Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.12093/) (2021)
- [Three Sentences Are All You Need: Local Path Enhanced Document Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01793/) (2021)
- [Document-Level Relation Extraction with Sentences Importance Estimation and Focusing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.12679/) (2022)
- [Learning Logic Rules for Document-level Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.05407/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [HunFlair2 in a cross-corpus evaluation of biomedical named entity recognition and normalization tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12372/) (2024)
- [Temporal Relation Extraction in Clinical Texts: A Span-based Graph Transformer Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18085/) (2025)
- [On the Robustness of Document-Level Relation Extraction Models to Entity Name Variations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07444/) (2024)
- [ZeFaV: Boosting Large Language Models for Zero-shot Fact Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.11247/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, numerous efforts have continued to push up performance boundaries of document-level relation extraction (DocRE) and have claimed significant progress in DocRE. In this paper, we do not aim at proposing a novel model for DocRE. Instead, we take a closer look at the field to see if these performance gains are actually true. By taking a comprehensive literature review and a thorough examination of popular DocRE datasets, we find that these performance gains are achieved upon a strong or even untenable assumption in common: all named entities are perfectly localized, normalized, and typed in advance. Next, we construct four types of entity mention attacks to examine the robustness of typical DocRE models by behavioral probing. We also have a close check on model usability in a more realistic setting. Our findings reveal that most of current DocRE models are vulnerable to entity mention attacks and difficult to be deployed in real-world end-user NLP applications. Our study calls more attentions for future research to stop simplifying problem setups, and to model DocRE in the wild rather than in an unrealistic Utopian world.
