# LMD: Light-weight Prediction Quality Estimation for Object Detection in Lidar Point Clouds

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07835 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07835/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11027/) (2019)
- [PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05784/) (2018)
- [Center-based 3D Object Detection and Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11275/) (2020)
- [Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09457/) (2019)
- [PIXOR: Real-time 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06326/) (2019)
- [Training independent subnetworks for robust prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06610/) (2020)
- [LaserNet: An Efficient Probabilistic 3D Object Detector for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.08701/) (2019)
- [Multivariate Confidence Calibration for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13546/) (2020)
- [Towards Safe Autonomous Driving: Capture Uncertainty in the Deep Neural Network For Lidar 3D Vehicle Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.05132/) (2018)
- [MonoRUn: Monocular 3D Object Detection by Reconstruction and Uncertainty Propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12605/) (2021)
- [Prediction Error Meta Classification in Semantic Segmentation: Detection via Aggregated Dispersion Measures of Softmax Probabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00648/) (2018)
- [Uncertainty Quantification of Collaborative Detection for Self-Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.08162/) (2022)
- [Deep Active Learning for Efficient Training of a LiDAR 3D Object Detector](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.10609/) (2019)
- [Learning an Uncertainty-Aware Object Detector for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11375/) (2019)
- [GradDiv: Adversarial Robustness of Randomized Neural Networks via Gradient Diversity Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02425/) (2021)
- [GLENet: Boosting 3D Object Detectors with Generative Label Uncertainty Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02466/) (2022)
- [Leveraging Heteroscedastic Aleatoric Uncertainties for Robust Real-Time LiDAR 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.05590/) (2018)
- [MetaDetect: Uncertainty Quantification and Prediction Quality Estimates for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01695/) (2020)
- [Gradient-Based Quantification of Epistemic Uncertainty for Deep Object Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.04517/) (2021)
- [Prediction Surface Uncertainty Quantification in Object Detection Models for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.04991/) (2021)
- [Detection of False Positive and False Negative Samples in Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03673/) (2019)
- [LiDAR-MIMO: Efficient Uncertainty Estimation for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00214/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Uncertainty and Prediction Quality Estimation for Semantic Segmentation via Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11373/) (2024)
- [From Label Error Detection to Correction: A Modular Framework and Benchmark for Object Detection Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06556/) (2025)
- [Learning to Detect Label Errors by Making Them: A Method for Segmentation and Object Detection Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17930/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Object detection on Lidar point cloud data is a promising technology for autonomous driving and robotics which has seen a significant rise in performance and accuracy during recent years. Particularly uncertainty estimation is a crucial component for down-stream tasks and deep neural networks remain error-prone even for predictions with high confidence. Previously proposed methods for quantifying prediction uncertainty tend to alter the training scheme of the detector or rely on prediction sampling which results in vastly increased inference time. In order to address these two issues, we propose LidarMetaDetect (LMD), a light-weight post-processing scheme for prediction quality estimation. Our method can easily be added to any pre-trained Lidar object detector without altering anything about the base model and is purely based on post-processing, therefore, only leading to a negligible computational overhead. Our experiments show a significant increase of statistical reliability in separating true from false predictions. We propose and evaluate an additional application of our method leading to the detection of annotation errors. Explicit samples and a conservative count of annotation error proposals indicates the viability of our method for large-scale datasets like KITTI and nuScenes. On the widely-used nuScenes test dataset, 43 out of the top 100 proposals of our method indicate, in fact, erroneous annotations.
