# Knowledge-Prompted Estimator: A Novel Approach to Explainable Machine Translation Assessment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07486 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07486/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03493/) (2022)
- [How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01502/) (2019)
- [Massively Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.10464/) (2018)
- [Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14520/) (2023)
- [MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02622/) (2019)
- [Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00720/) (2022)
- [How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09210/) (2023)
- [Multilingual Universal Sentence Encoder for Semantic Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.04307/) (2019)
- [Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08745/) (2023)
- [To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10821/) (2021)
- [Prompting PaLM for Translation: Assessing Strategies and Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09102/) (2022)
- [On the Limitations of Cross-lingual Encoders as Exposed by Reference-Free Machine Translation Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01196/) (2020)
- [ChatGPT, Large Language Technologies, and the Bumpy Road of Benefiting Humanity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11163/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [The Eval4NLP 2023 Shared Task on Prompting Large Language Models as Explainable Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19792/) (2023)
- [From Handcrafted Features to LLMs: A Brief Survey for Machine Translation Quality Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14118/) (2024)
- [Little Giants: Exploring the Potential of Small LLMs as Evaluation Metrics in Summarization in the Eval4NLP 2023 Shared Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.00686/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Cross-lingual Machine Translation (MT) quality estimation plays a crucial role in evaluating translation performance. GEMBA, the first MT quality assessment metric based on Large Language Models (LLMs), employs one-step prompting to achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) in system-level MT quality estimation; however, it lacks segment-level analysis. In contrast, Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting outperforms one-step prompting by offering improved reasoning and explainability. In this paper, we introduce Knowledge-Prompted Estimator (KPE), a CoT prompting method that combines three one-step prompting techniques, including perplexity, token-level similarity, and sentence-level similarity. This method attains enhanced performance for segment-level estimation compared with previous deep learning models and one-step prompting approaches. Furthermore, supplementary experiments on word-level visualized alignment demonstrate that our KPE method significantly improves token alignment compared with earlier models and provides better interpretability for MT quality estimation. Code will be released upon publication.