# Shedding light on underrepresentation and Sampling Bias in machine learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05068 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05068/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11834/) (2019)
- [Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09797/) (2018)
- [REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.07911/) (2019)
- [Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12002/) (2018)
- [Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.10075/) (2020)
- [Neither Private Nor Fair: Impact of Data Imbalance on Utility and Fairness in Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.06389/) (2020)
- [Exploring Racial Bias within Face Recognition via per-subject Adversarially-Enabled Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.08945/) (2020)
- [Towards Accuracy-Fairness Paradox: Adversarial Example-based Data Augmentation for Visual Debiasing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.13632/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Accurately measuring discrimination is crucial to faithfully assessing fairness of trained machine learning (ML) models. Any bias in measuring discrimination leads to either amplification or underestimation of the existing disparity. Several sources of bias exist and it is assumed that bias resulting from machine learning is born equally by different groups (e.g. females vs males, whites vs blacks, etc.). If, however, bias is born differently by different groups, it may exacerbate discrimination against specific sub-populations. Sampling bias, is inconsistently used in the literature to describe bias due to the sampling procedure. In this paper, we attempt to disambiguate this term by introducing clearly defined variants of sampling bias, namely, sample size bias (SSB) and underrepresentation bias (URB). We show also how discrimination can be decomposed into variance, bias, and noise. Finally, we challenge the commonly accepted mitigation approach that discrimination can be addressed by collecting more samples of the underrepresented group.