# Deploying a Robust Active Preference Elicitation Algorithm on MTurk: Experiment Design, Interface, and Evaluation for COVID-19 Patient Prioritization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04061 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04061/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Adapting a Kidney Exchange Algorithm to Align with Human Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.09755/) (2020)
- [Understanding Frontline Workers' and Unhoused Individuals' Perspectives on AI Used in Homeless Services](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09743/) (2023)
- [Machine Learning-powered Iterative Combinatorial Auctions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08042/) (2019)
- [Robust Active Preference Elicitation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.01899/) (2020)
- [Indecision Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.08485/) (2020)
- [A Cost-Effective Framework for Preference Elicitation and Aggregation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.05287/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Can AI Model the Complexities of Human Moral Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Kidney Allocation Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00940/) (2025)
- [On the Pros and Cons of Active Learning for Moral Preference Elicitation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18889/) (2024)
- [On The Stability of Moral Preferences: A Problem with Computational Elicitation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.02862/) (2024)
- [Towards Cognitively-Faithful Decision-Making Models to Improve AI Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.04445/) (2025)
- [Preference Elicitation for Policy Optimization and Application to Aligning Heart Transplantation with Human Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.28620/) (2026)
- [Toward AI Matching Policies in Homeless Services: A Qualitative Study with Policymakers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07129/) (2025)
- [Internal Pluralism and the Limits of Pairwise Comparisons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02672/) (2026)
- [Position: We Need Practical AI Alignment Methods to Mirror Human Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.12372/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Preference elicitation leverages AI or optimization to learn stakeholder preferences in settings ranging from marketing to public policy. The online robust preference elicitation procedure of arXiv:2003.01899 has been shown in simulation to outperform various other elicitation procedures in terms of effectively learning individuals' true utilities. However, as with any simulation, the method makes a series of assumptions that cannot easily be verified to hold true beyond simulation. Thus, we propose to validate the robust method's performance using real users, focusing on the particular challenge of selecting policies for prioritizing COVID-19 patients for scarce hospital resources during the pandemic. To this end, we develop an online platform for preference elicitation where users report their preferences between alternatives over a moderate number of pairwise comparisons chosen by a particular elicitation procedure. We recruit 193 Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) workers to report their preferences and demonstrate that the robust method outperforms asking random queries by 21%, the next best performing method in the simulated results of arXiv:2003.01899, in terms of recommending policies with a higher utility.
