# Guided scenarios with simulated expert personae: a remarkable strategy to perform cognitive work

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03104 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03104/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 12 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [In-Context Impersonation Reveals Large Language Models' Strengths and Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14930/) (2023)
- [Fact-Checking Complex Claims with Program-Guided Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12744/) (2023)
- [ExpertPrompting: Instructing Large Language Models to be Distinguished Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14688/) (2023)
- [Bits of Grass: Does GPT already know how to write like Whitman?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11064/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14735/) (2023)
- [Are LLMs Good Annotators for Discourse-level Event Relation Extraction?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19568/) (2024)
- [From Instruction to Output: The Role of Prompting in Modern NLG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11179/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) trained on a substantial corpus of human knowledge and literature productively work with a large array of facts from that corpus. Surprisingly, they are also able to re-create the behaviors of personae that are captured within the corpus. By forming teams of simulated personae, supplying contexts that set the stage, and providing gentle prompts, one can move through scenarios that elicit expert behavior to perform meaningful cognitive work. The power of this strategy is demonstrated with two examples, one attacking factuality of LLM responses and the other reproducing a very recently published result in quantum optics.
