# Approximate Stein Classes for Truncated Density Estimation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00602 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00602/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05600/) (2019)
- [Convex optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01946/) (2021)
- [How to Train Your Energy-Based Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03288/) (2021)
- [A Kernelized Stein Discrepancy for Goodness-of-fit Tests and Model Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.03253/) (2016)
- [A Kernel Test of Goodness of Fit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.02964/) (2016)
- [Measuring Sample Quality with Stein's Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03039/) (2015)
- [Minimum Stein Discrepancy Estimators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08283/) (2019)
- [Sequential Neural Score Estimation: Likelihood-Free Inference with Conditional Score Based Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04872/) (2022)
- [Efficient Learning of Generative Models via Finite-Difference Score Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.03317/) (2020)
- [A Linear-Time Kernel Goodness-of-Fit Test](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07673/) (2017)
- [Stochastic Stein Discrepancies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02857/) (2020)
- [Estimation of High-Dimensional Graphical Models Using Regularized Score Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1507.00433/) (2015)
- [Estimating Density Models with Truncation Boundaries using Score Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03834/) (2019)
- [A Kernel Stein Test for Comparing Latent Variable Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.00586/) (2019)
- [Sampling with Mirrored Stein Operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12506/) (2021)
- [Generalized Score Matching for General Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11428/) (2020)
- [Interpretable Stein Goodness-of-fit Tests on Riemannian Manifolds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00895/) (2021)
- [Standardisation-function Kernel Stein Discrepancy: A Unifying View on Kernel Stein Discrepancy Tests for Goodness-of-fit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12105/) (2021)
- [Score Matching for Truncated Density Estimation on a Manifold](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14668/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Event Generation with Parallel Langevin Sampling and Learned Stein Diagnostics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.14854/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Estimating truncated density models is difficult, as these models have intractable normalising constants and hard to satisfy boundary conditions. Score matching can be adapted to solve the truncated density estimation problem, but requires a continuous weighting function which takes zero at the boundary and is positive elsewhere. Evaluation of such a weighting function (and its gradient) often requires a closed-form expression of the truncation boundary and finding a solution to a complicated optimisation problem. In this paper, we propose approximate Stein classes, which in turn leads to a relaxed Stein identity for truncated density estimation. We develop a novel discrepancy measure, truncated kernelised Stein discrepancy (TKSD), which does not require fixing a weighting function in advance, and can be evaluated using only samples on the boundary. We estimate a truncated density model by minimising the Lagrangian dual of TKSD. Finally, experiments show the accuracy of our method to be an improvement over previous works even without the explicit functional form of the boundary.
