# A Call for Standardization and Validation of Text Style Transfer Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00539 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00539/

## Key facts

- Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 97 of its 168 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 97)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02116/) (2019)
- [Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.01626/) (2015)
- [CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.5726/) (2014)
- [A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08771/) (2018)
- [On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1259/) (2014)
- [BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04696/) (2020)
- [Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1408.5882/) (2014)
- [A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.03055/) (2015)
- [COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09025/) (2020)
- [Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.01759/) (2016)
- [Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02164/) (2019)
- [Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04009/) (2017)
- [Ups and Downs: Modeling the Visual Evolution of Fashion Trends with One-Class Collaborative Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.01585/) (2016)
- [A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Stories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.01696/) (2016)
- [The Pushshift Reddit Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08435/) (2020)
- [Toward Controlled Generation of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00955/) (2017)
- [Style Transfer from Non-Parallel Text by Cross-Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09655/) (2017)
- [A Persona-Based Neural Conversation Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.06155/) (2016)
- [Dear Sir or Madam, May I introduce the GYAFC Dataset: Corpus, Benchmarks and Metrics for Formality Style Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06535/) (2018)
- [Building End-To-End Dialogue Systems Using Generative Hierarchical Neural Network Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1507.04808/) (2015)
- [Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.08868/) (2016)
- [Delete, Retrieve, Generate: A Simple Approach to Sentiment and Style Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06437/) (2018)
- [Reformulating Unsupervised Style Transfer as Paraphrase Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05700/) (2020)
- [Deep Learning for Text Style Transfer: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00416/) (2020)
- [Style Transfer in Text: Exploration and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.06861/) (2017)
- [With Little Power Comes Great Responsibility](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06595/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [On the Challenges and Opportunities in Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00025/) (2024)
- [Exploring Methods for Cross-lingual Text Style Transfer: The Case of Text Detoxification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13937/) (2023)
- [Text Style Transfer Evaluation Using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.13577/) (2023)
- [Distilling Text Style Transfer With Self-Explanation From LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01106/) (2024)
- [DetoxLLM: A Framework for Detoxification with Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15951/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Dynamic Topic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08627/) (2023)
- [Can LLMs Help Uncover Insights about LLMs? A Large-Scale, Evolving Literature Analysis of Frontier LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18791/) (2025)
- [Mind the Style Gap: Meta-Evaluation of Style and Attribute Transfer Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15022/) (2025)
- [Tethering Broken Themes: Aligning Neural Topic Models with Labels and Authors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18140/) (2024)
- [DiffStyleTS: Diffusion Model for Style Transfer in Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11335/) (2025)
- [SETTP: Style Extraction and Tunable Inference via Dual-level Transferable Prompt Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15556/) (2024)
- [Challenging Assumptions in Learning Generic Text Style Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16073/) (2025)
- [Casual as an Anchor: Resolving Supervision Misalignment in Formality Transfer Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29365/) (2026)
- [Metric-Construction Coupling Inflates Measured Synthetic Dialect Recovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00164/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Text Style Transfer (TST) evaluation is, in practice, inconsistent. Therefore, we conduct a meta-analysis on human and automated TST evaluation and experimentation that thoroughly examines existing literature in the field. The meta-analysis reveals a substantial standardization gap in human and automated evaluation. In addition, we also find a validation gap: only few automated metrics have been validated using human experiments. To this end, we thoroughly scrutinize both the standardization and validation gap and reveal the resulting pitfalls. This work also paves the way to close the standardization and validation gap in TST evaluation by calling out requirements to be met by future research.
