# Guiding Computational Stance Detection with Expanded Stance Triangle Framework

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19845 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19845/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 May 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08821/) (2021)
- [A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04023/) (2023)
- [BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.10200/) (2020)
- [Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03683/) (2019)
- [Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03514/) (2023)
- [End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corpora](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06321/) (2019)
- [Zero-Shot Stance Detection: A Dataset and Model using Generalized Topic Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03640/) (2020)
- [Stance Detection with Bidirectional Conditional Encoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05464/) (2016)
- [MITRE at SemEval-2016 Task 6: Transfer Learning for Stance Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03784/) (2016)
- [Stance Detection in Web and Social Media: A Comparative Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.05976/) (2020)
- [DeepStance at SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets Using Character and Word-Level CNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05694/) (2016)
- [Understanding the Political Ideology of Legislators from Social Media Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.09594/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [EMBRACE: Shaping Inclusive Opinion Representation by Aligning Implicit Conversations with Social Norms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.20264/) (2025)
- [Multi-label and Multi-target Sampling of Machine Annotation for Computational Stance Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04495/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Stance detection determines whether the author of a piece of text is in favor of, against, or neutral towards a specified target, and can be used to gain valuable insights into social media. The ubiquitous indirect referral of targets makes this task challenging, as it requires computational solutions to model semantic features and infer the corresponding implications from a literal statement. Moreover, the limited amount of available training data leads to subpar performance in out-of-domain and cross-target scenarios, as data-driven approaches are prone to rely on superficial and domain-specific features. In this work, we decompose the stance detection task from a linguistic perspective, and investigate key components and inference paths in this task. The stance triangle is a generic linguistic framework previously proposed to describe the fundamental ways people express their stance. We further expand it by characterizing the relationship between explicit and implicit objects. We then use the framework to extend one single training corpus with additional annotation. Experimental results show that strategically-enriched data can significantly improve the performance on out-of-domain and cross-target evaluation.