# Chain-of-Thought Hub: A Continuous Effort to Measure Large Language Models' Reasoning Performance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17306 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17306/

## Key facts

- Cited by 102 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 May 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Process reward models for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/process-reward-models-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14858/) (2022)
- [PaLM 2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10403/) (2023)
- [A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00861/) (2021)
- [C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08322/) (2023)
- [Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14375/) (2022)
- [Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00720/) (2022)
- [The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15717/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 102)

- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03109/) (2023)
- [WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09583/) (2023)
- [Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16944/) (2023)
- [Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01825/) (2023)
- [Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01693/) (2023)
- [Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05374/) (2023)
- [LLMLingua: Compressing Prompts for Accelerated Inference of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05736/) (2023)
- [SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10635/) (2023)
- [Survey of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Revealed by Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10844/) (2023)
- [EvoPrompt: Connecting LLMs with Evolutionary Algorithms Yields Powerful Prompt Optimizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08532/) (2023)
- [SelfCheck: Using LLMs to Zero-Shot Check Their Own Step-by-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00436/) (2023)
- [GEAR: An Efficient KV Cache Compression Recipe for Near-Lossless Generative Inference of LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05527/) (2024)
- [LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16289/) (2023)
- [Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19825/) (2024)
- [PQCache: Product Quantization-based KVCache for Long Context LLM Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12820/) (2024)
- [CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14809/) (2024)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01869/) (2024)
- [Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19943/) (2024)
- [BadChain: Backdoor Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12242/) (2024)
- [Contrastive Decoding Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09117/) (2023)
- [A Peek into Token Bias: Large Language Models Are Not Yet Genuine Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11050/) (2024)
- [Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00280/) (2023)
- [LLM2LLM: Boosting LLMs with Novel Iterative Data Enhancement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15042/) (2024)
- [Inadequacies of Large Language Model Benchmarks in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09880/) (2024)
- [Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models via Multi-Agent Peer Review Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08152/) (2023)
- [ChatGLM-Math: Improving Math Problem-Solving in Large Language Models with a Self-Critique Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02893/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Focus on Error Identification and Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00755/) (2024)
- [Do Emergent Abilities Exist in Quantized Large Language Models: An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08072/) (2023)
- [Rethinking Reflection in Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04022/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) are continuously being developed, their evaluation becomes increasingly important yet challenging. This work proposes Chain-of-Thought Hub, an open-source evaluation suite on the multi-step reasoning capabilities of large language models. We are interested in this setting for two reasons: (1) from the behavior of GPT and PaLM model family, we observe that complex reasoning is likely to be a key differentiator between weaker and stronger LLMs; (2) we envisage large language models to become the next-generation computational platform and foster an ecosystem of LLM-based new applications, this naturally requires the foundation models to perform complex tasks that often involve the composition of linguistic and logical operations. Our approach is to compile a suite of challenging reasoning benchmarks to track the progress of LLMs. Our current results show that: (1) model scale clearly correlates with reasoning capabilities; (2) As of May 2023, Claude-v1.3 and PaLM-2 are the only two models that are comparable with GPT-4, while open-sourced models still lag behind; (3) LLaMA-65B performs closely to code-davinci-002, indicating that with successful further development such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), it has great potential to be close to GPT-3.5-Turbo. Our results also suggest that for the open-source efforts to catch up, the community may focus more on building better base models and exploring RLHF.