# Automatic Emotion Experiencer Recognition

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16731 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16731/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 May 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Dimensional Modeling of Emotions in Text with Appraisal Theories: Corpus Creation, Annotation Reliability, and Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05238/) (2022)
- [GoodNewsEveryone: A Corpus of News Headlines Annotated with Emotions, Semantic Roles, and Reader Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03184/) (2019)
- [Emotion Intensities in Tweets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.03696/) (2017)
- [Appraisal Theories for Emotion Classification in Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.14155/) (2020)
- [Crowdsourcing and Validating Event-focused Emotion Corpora for German and English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13618/) (2019)
- [x-enVENT: A Corpus of Event Descriptions with Experiencer-specific Emotion and Appraisal Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10909/) (2022)
- [APPReddit: a Corpus of Reddit Posts Annotated for Appraisal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15627/) (2022)
- [Experiencer-Specific Emotion and Appraisal Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12078/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Where are We in Event-centric Emotion Analysis? Bridging Emotion Role Labeling and Appraisal-based Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.02092/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The most prominent subtask in emotion analysis is emotion classification; to assign a category to a textual unit, for instance a social media post. Many research questions from the social sciences do, however, not only require the detection of the emotion of an author of a post but to understand who is ascribed an emotion in text. This task is tackled by emotion role labeling which aims at extracting who is described in text to experience an emotion, why, and towards whom. This could, however, be considered overly sophisticated if the main question to answer is who feels which emotion. A targeted approach for such setup is to classify emotion experiencer mentions (aka "emoters") regarding the emotion they presumably perceive. This task is similar to named entity recognition of person names with the difference that not every mentioned entity name is an emoter. While, very recently, data with emoter annotations has been made available, no experiments have yet been performed to detect such mentions. With this paper, we provide baseline experiments to understand how challenging the task is. We further evaluate the impact on experiencer-specific emotion categorization and appraisal detection in a pipeline, when gold mentions are not available. We show that experiencer detection in text is a challenging task, with a precision of .82 and a recall of .56 (F1 =.66). These results motivate future work of jointly modeling emoter spans and emotion/appraisal predictions.