# Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15074 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15074/

## Key facts

- Cited by 77 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 19 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Mathematical reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/mathematical-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06209/) (2017)
- [C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08322/) (2023)
- [Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.04146/) (2017)
- [Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08758/) (2021)
- [MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00110/) (2021)
- [PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Change](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10498/) (2022)
- [Let's Sample Step by Step: Adaptive-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning and Coding with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11860/) (2023)
- [Ape210K: A Large-Scale and Template-Rich Dataset of Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11506/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 77)

- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03109/) (2023)
- [Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07985/) (2024)
- [DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11456/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models Empowered Agent-based Modeling and Simulation: A Survey and Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11970/) (2023)
- [SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10635/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19736/) (2023)
- [Functional Benchmarks for Robust Evaluation of Reasoning Performance, and the Reasoning Gap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19450/) (2024)
- [OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12753/) (2024)
- [PhysReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Physics-Based Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12054/) (2025)
- [UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00334/) (2025)
- [A Survey of Scientific Large Language Models: From Data Foundations to Agent Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.21148/) (2025)
- [Position: AI Evaluation Should Learn from How We Test Humans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10512/) (2023)
- [Maximum Likelihood Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02710/) (2026)
- [Are large language models superhuman chemists?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01475/) (2024)
- [Theoretical Physics Benchmark (TPBench) -- a Dataset and Study of AI Reasoning Capabilities in Theoretical Physics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15815/) (2025)
- [Position: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Significantly Advance Scientific Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02871/) (2025)
- [HARDMath: A Benchmark Dataset for Challenging Problems in Applied Mathematics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09988/) (2024)
- [A Fast Optimization View: Reformulating Single Layer Attention in LLM Based on Tensor and SVM Trick, and Solving It in Matrix Multiplication Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07418/) (2023)
- [Skywork-Math: Data Scaling Laws for Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models -- The Story Goes On](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08348/) (2024)
- [Improving Physics Reasoning in Large Language Models Using Mixture of Refinement Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.00821/) (2024)
- [MM-PhyQA: Multimodal Physics Question-Answering With Multi-Image CoT Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08704/) (2024)
- [SciHorizon: Benchmarking AI-for-Science Readiness from Scientific Data to Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13503/) (2025)
- [Evaluation of LLM Chatbots for OSINT-based Cyber Threat Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.15127/) (2024)
- [Large Physics Models: Towards a collaborative approach with Large Language Models and Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05382/) (2025)
- [Neural Task Synthesis for Visual Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18342/) (2023)
- [PertEval: Unveiling Real Knowledge Capacity of LLMs with Knowledge-Invariant Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19740/) (2024)
- [Exposing the Achilles' Heel: Evaluating LLMs Ability to Handle Mistakes in Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10834/) (2024)
- [EngiBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Engineering Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17677/) (2025)
- [MaScQA: A Question Answering Dataset for Investigating Materials Science Knowledge of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09115/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The performance of large language models (LLMs) on existing reasoning benchmarks has significantly improved over the past years. In response, we present JEEBench, a considerably more challenging benchmark dataset for evaluating the problem solving abilities of LLMs. We curate 515 challenging pre-engineering mathematics, physics and chemistry problems from the highly competitive IIT JEE-Advanced exam. Long-horizon reasoning on top of deep in-domain knowledge is essential for solving problems in this benchmark. Our evaluation on various open-source and proprietary models reveals that the highest performance, even after using techniques like self-consistency, self-refinement and chain-of-thought prompting, is less than 40%. The typical failure modes of GPT-4, the best model, are errors in algebraic manipulation, difficulty in grounding abstract concepts into mathematical equations accurately and failure in retrieving relevant domain-specific concepts. We also observe that by mere prompting, GPT-4 is unable to assess risk introduced by negative marking for incorrect answers. For this, we develop a post-hoc confidence-thresholding method over self-consistency, which enables effective response selection. We hope that our challenging benchmark will guide future re-search in problem-solving using LLMs.