# Ranger: A Toolkit for Effect-Size Based Multi-Task Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15048 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15048/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08663/) (2021)
- [Efficiently Teaching an Effective Dense Retriever with Balanced Topic Aware Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06967/) (2021)
- [What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02145/) (2021)
- [The Dangers of Underclaiming: Reasons for Caution When Reporting How NLP Systems Fail](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08300/) (2021)
- [Introducing Neural Bag of Whole-Words with ColBERTer: Contextualized Late Interactions using Enhanced Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13088/) (2022)
- [Streamlining Evaluation with ir-measures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.13466/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [SPLADE-v3: New baselines for SPLADE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06789/) (2024)
- [Hard Negatives, Hard Lessons: Revisiting Training Data Quality for Robust Information Retrieval with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16967/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we introduce Ranger - a toolkit to facilitate the easy use of effect-size-based meta-analysis for multi-task evaluation in NLP and IR. We observed that our communities often face the challenge of aggregating results over incomparable metrics and scenarios, which makes conclusions and take-away messages less reliable. With Ranger, we aim to address this issue by providing a task-agnostic toolkit that combines the effect of a treatment on multiple tasks into one statistical evaluation, allowing for comparison of metrics and computation of an overall summary effect. Our toolkit produces publication-ready forest plots that enable clear communication of evaluation results over multiple tasks. Our goal with the ready-to-use Ranger toolkit is to promote robust, effect-size-based evaluation and improve evaluation standards in the community. We provide two case studies for common IR and NLP settings to highlight Ranger's benefits.