# Measuring Faithful and Plausible Visual Grounding in VQA

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15015 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15015/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01497/) (2015)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.03144/) (2016)
- [Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0473/) (2014)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07490/) (2019)
- [Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.07998/) (2017)
- [Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.06165/) (2020)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03292/) (2018)
- [Attention is not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10186/) (2019)
- [Attention is not not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04626/) (2019)
- [ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03429/) (2019)
- [The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12584/) (2019)
- [Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.00377/) (2017)
- [Deep Modular Co-Attention Networks for Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.10770/) (2019)
- [Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02338/) (2018)
- [Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.03717/) (2017)
- [Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.08220/) (2016)
- [Compositional Attention Networks for Machine Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03067/) (2018)
- [Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08129/) (2018)
- [Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretations Difficult](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07781/) (2018)
- [Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Grounded](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.03751/) (2019)
- [Analyzing the Behavior of Visual Question Answering Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.07356/) (2016)
- [Human Attention in Visual Question Answering: Do Humans and Deep Networks Look at the Same Regions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03556/) (2016)
- [Towards Causal VQA: Revealing and Reducing Spurious Correlations by Invariant and Covariant Semantic Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.07538/) (2019)
- [Roses Are Red, Violets Are Blue... but Should Vqa Expect Them To?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05121/) (2020)
- [Self-Critical Reasoning for Robust Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.09998/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [FlowVQA: Mapping Multimodal Logic in Visual Question Answering with Flowcharts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19237/) (2024)
- [Surgical-VQLA++: Adversarial Contrastive Learning for Calibrated Robust Visual Question-Localized Answering in Robotic Surgery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04958/) (2024)
- [Uncovering the Full Potential of Visual Grounding Methods in VQA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07803/) (2024)
- [On the Role of Visual Grounding in VQA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18253/) (2024)
- [MedXplain-VQA: Multi-Component Explainable Medical Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.22803/) (2025)
- [Explicit Logic Channel for Validation and Enhancement of MLLMs on Zero-Shot Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.11689/) (2026)
- [Don't Just Look, Intervene: Perturbation Based Region Labeling for VQA Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.13228/) (2026)
- [Rethinking Latent Visual Reasoning: Grounding Latent Reasoning in Visual Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34563/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Metrics for Visual Grounding (VG) in Visual Question Answering (VQA) systems primarily aim to measure a system's reliance on relevant parts of the image when inferring an answer to the given question. Lack of VG has been a common problem among state-of-the-art VQA systems and can manifest in over-reliance on irrelevant image parts or a disregard for the visual modality entirely. Although inference capabilities of VQA models are often illustrated by a few qualitative illustrations, most systems are not quantitatively assessed for their VG properties. We believe, an easily calculated criterion for meaningfully measuring a system's VG can help remedy this shortcoming, as well as add another valuable dimension to model evaluations and analysis. To this end, we propose a new VG metric that captures if a model a) identifies question-relevant objects in the scene, and b) actually relies on the information contained in the relevant objects when producing its answer, i.e., if its visual grounding is both "faithful" and "plausible". Our metric, called "Faithful and Plausible Visual Grounding" (FPVG), is straightforward to determine for most VQA model designs. We give a detailed description of FPVG and evaluate several reference systems spanning various VQA architectures. Code to support the metric calculations on the GQA data set is available on GitHub.